By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Trustee (Nashville, TN) There is no requirement to show a change in circumstance in order to modify a Chapter 13 plan pursuant to § 1329. Whaley v. Guillen (In re Guillen), 2020 WL 5015287 (11th Cir. Aug. 25, 2020) (Marcus) Case Summary Rachel Guillen filed a Chapter 13 petition in August of 2015....
Critical Case Comment
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee for the Middle District of Tennessee
When the wages of an insolvent spouse are deposited into the couple’s entireties account, both spouses are fraudulent transferees; wage deposits spent on non-necessary expenditures are recoverable from the joint account by determining the proportion to the overall share of wages in the account as a whole. (Ambro) In re Titus, 916 F.3d 293 (3rd Cir. February 20, 2019)
Case Summary
In 1999, the Pittsburgh law firm of Titus and McConomy dissolved. Paul Titus, a named partner, joined . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or sign in below:
Related Articles
Post-Petition Equity in Chapter 13 – Who Gets The $$$
For Shame
The Collector
From the Supreme Court – Miller v. US
The Bankruptcy Moot Court Experience – Duberstein 2019
Discrimination Denied
Bankruptcy Court Strikes Back: Awarding $825,940.55 in Sanctions for Bad Faith Filing
Declining Cases and Increasing Judicial Vacancies
Supreme Court Denies Cert
Critical Case Comment