Avoidance Powers In Chapter 13 – Part 1 of 6

A bankruptcy court has the authority and the ability to deal with a “sovereign citizen” petition but will give the debtor an opportunity to comply with the Bankruptcy Code. Did you know . . . The Academy has podcasts? Welp, we do. On the topic of sovereign citizens, check out Do Not Engage Parts 1 & 2 under Fixing Broke: Consumer Bankruptcy Diary wherever you get your podcasts.

Does § 523(a)(15) include claims by a spouse against the other spouse for fraud etc, i.e., §§ 523(a)(2), (4) and (6), in a chapter 7 case?

Failure of a pro se debtor to pay the third installment of filing fees justifies dismissal of the case; debtor’s failure to submit a brief in compliance with Rule 8014 justifies a 180-day bar on refiling.

Although this article was originally published in 2009, Judge Morgenstern-Clarren took a fresh look just this week. It is just as relevant today as the day she first wrote it

In the continually evolving field of consumer bankruptcy law, a series of Supreme Court decisions shape how cases are administered nationwide. Over the coming weeks, we will highlight key decisions that every bankruptcy practitioner should recognize—both by name and by the issues they resolve. This week’s ‘memory work’ is: Johnson v. Homestate Bank; Harrington v. Purdue Pharma; Bartenwerfer v. Buckley; Fulton