National Consumer Law Center Advocates Urge HUD to Take Immediate Action to Reduce Foreclosures on Widows and Widowers of Reverse Mortgage Borrowers

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: November 27, 2018

National Consumer Law Center: Jan Kruse ([email protected]), (617) 542-8010

Washington, D.C. — Reverse mortgages are intended to help elders age in their homes. Yet, across the country, widows and widowers are losing their homes because of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)’s failure to prevent foreclosures on reverse mortgages that their now-deceased spouses previously obtained. Advocates at the National Consumer Law Center today issued a new report showing the harm that HUD’s practice causes to widows and widowers, and urging HUD to take immediate action to better inform reverse mortgage borrowers and their spouses about options to avoid foreclosure on a non-borrowing spouse, remove arbitrary and unrealistic deadlines for lenders to elect to participate in the program, and ensure that the program can work effectively to help non-borrowing spouses stay in their homes.

“Failing to take reasonable steps to protect widows and widowers from a foreclosure risk caused by HUD’s own unlawful regulation is not only unjust, it’s bad policy,” said Sarah Mancini, an attorney with the National Consumer Law Center. “A significant number of older homeowners now face the loss of their homes as well as their community support networks due to HUD’s harsh deadlines and a lack of information.”

Reverse mortgage loans are designed to make it easier for older homeowners to age in place by allowing them to borrow against the equity in the home without the risk of displacement. The proceeds of a reverse mortgage can be taken as a lump sum, a line of credit, or a stream of monthly payments. So long as the borrower continues to occupy the home as his or her principal residence, the borrower must pay property taxes and the homeowner’s insurance premium, but need not make payments of principal or interest on the loan. Unlike most mortgages, where the balance goes down over time, with a reverse mortgage the loan balance grows over time as the interest is added to the principal balance (hence the name “reverse” mortgage). The full loan balance becomes due and payable upon a triggering event – in most cases, the death of the last remaining borrower.

Congress specified that HUD could only insure loans that protected both the homeowner and any spouse from displacement. However, despite this requirement, HUD issued regulations that required lenders to use form loan documents that made the loans due and payable upon the death of the borrower – ignoring any spouse who was not included as a borrower on the loan. This created an incentive for some lenders and mortgage brokers to encourage married couples to leave the younger spouse off the loan. Most couples who opted to take out a reverse mortgage in the name of only one of the spouses had no idea that the non-borrowing spouse would face foreclosure and eviction because the loan would become due and payable upon the death of the borrowing spouse.

In response to litigation, HUD changed its regulations for new reverse mortgages issued after August 2014, but pre-2014 loans still go into foreclosure unless the surviving spouse can take critical steps within a very short time after the death of the borrowing spouse. The surviving spouses are often unaware of the significant substantive requirements and short deadlines, and may be overwhelmed by the many demands they face after losing a loved one.

“HUD should require servicers to regularly inform borrowers and their spouses of the proper procedures to remain in their homes,” said Mancini. “Right now, too many spouses have no idea that options exist until it is too late.”

NCLC attorneys recommend the following changes in order to make assistance for reverse mortgage borrowers more accessible and viable for non-borrowing spouses.

  • HUD should remove unnecessary deadlines for the program or, at a minimum, provide waivers of deadlines in appropriate cases.
  • HUD should require servicers to communicate clearly with borrowers and non-borrowing spouses about the program and steps needed to qualify for the program, beginning, even before the borrower’s death.
  • HUD should allow additional time for non-borrowing spouses to cure a default on property taxes or insurance when spouses are actively attempting to repay these charges or are eligible for help through an assistance program such as a Hardest Hit Funds program.
  • HUD should require servicers to communicate with non-borrowing spouses at every step of the process, and HUD’s Servicing Center should provide accurate, up to date information to any non-borrowing spouse who makes an inquiry about the status of an application for the program.
  • HUD should expand the program to include non-borrowing spouses who want to remain in the home when the borrowing spouse is still living but has moved out permanently, for example due to health reasons.

For a complete list of recommendations and for more information on reverse mortgages and HUD’s programs, view NCLC’s issue brief.

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

Related Articles

February 23, 2020
By Lawrence R. Ahern, III, Brown & Ahern (Nashville, TN) Introduction This series has focused on the four bankruptcy-related bills that were enacted during the 116th Congress and signed into law on August 23, 2019. One bill, the Small Business Reorganization Act of 2019 (SBRA), became effective February 19, 2020. It appears in its entirety in Appendix B to this...
Members
Copy of Hildebrand-2016
A month-to-month residential lease can be assumed and defaults cured in a Chapter 13 plan. (Rucker) In re Mattoon, 2022 WL 2080184 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. June 9, 2022) Case Summary Sarah Mattoon executed a lease with Open Doors in September of 2019. Several of Ms. Mattoon’s family members lived with her in the rented apartment including her “companion” and her...
Members
May 3, 2020
By Cathy Moran, Esq. (Redwood City, CA) After the pandemic, when the economy lurches back into motion, bankruptcy lawyers will confront a clutch of troubled Chapter 13 cases. In the face of disruption, distress, and the unknown, we'll be called on to guide clients forward, in one direction or another. Let's review the questions we'll need to answer in order...
Members
February 10, 2019
Rebecca Rogers Garcia was a staff attorney for Mary B. Grossman, the Chapter 13 Trustee in Milwaukee from 2002 until November 2014. Prior to her employment with the Chapter 13 Trustee; she represented debtors in consumer cases. Ms. Garcia is on the board of the Bankruptcy, Insolvency and Creditors Rights Section of the State Bar of Wisconsin and a member...
August 18, 2019
Taxpayers with expiring individual taxpayer identification numbers should renew their number ASAP. There are nearly 2 million ITINs set to expire at the end of 2019. Taxpayers with an expiring number should renew before the end of this year. This will help avoid unnecessary delays related to their tax refunds next year. ITINs are used by taxpayers required to file...
October 18, 2020
By James J. Robinson, Chief United States Bankruptcy Judge, Northern District of Alabama Can the trustee challenge the debtor’s attorney’s fee? In re Rodriguez Perez, 2018 WL 3655656 (Bankr. D.P.R. 2018). In this case, the chapter 13 trustee asked the bankruptcy court to assess the contract between the debtor and counsel under § 526-528. The trustee alleged that the contract...
Members
Copy of Hildebrand-2016
February 4, 2022
Chapter 13 debtor’s counsel’s fee award was reduced to $48,116 from the requested $95,480 due to pre-petition payments, confusing and “lumped” time entries, and excessive hourly rates for some services performed, even though the debtor’s Chapter 13 plan was never even proposed much less confirmed. The debtor never attended a meeting of creditors, but the debtor managed to recover his...
Members
April 4, 2021
By Lawrence R. Ahern III, Brown & Ahern (Nashville, TN) Introduction We saw in Part 1 that the circuits are falling in line to follow the "snapshot" rule, fixing the debtor's exemption rights as of the date of the petition and finding support in both the Code and recent Supreme Court jurisprudence. As the First Circuit put it . ....
Members
Copy of Hildebrand-2016
July 24, 2022
Secured creditor in a Chapter 13 case entitled to relief from the stay due to lack of adequate protection where the creditor neglects to file a proof of claim and, as a consequent, received no payments under a Chapter 13 plan. (Conley) Weyer v. Valley Communities Credit Union, 2022 WL 1597293 (W.D. Wis. May 19, 2022) Case Summary Dana and...
Members
__ head shot
May 21, 2023
Chapter 13 plans and confirmation orders will occasionally include post-confirmation disclosure and turnover requirements for tax returns and refunds and for other types of post-petition recoveries and income. Debtors are expected, on their own and without the need for rigorous trustee oversight, to fulfill the turnover requirements as a condition of plan completion and discharge. What happens when the case...
Members