National Consumer Law Center Advocates Urge HUD to Take Immediate Action to Reduce Foreclosures on Widows and Widowers of Reverse Mortgage Borrowers

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: November 27, 2018

National Consumer Law Center: Jan Kruse ([email protected]), (617) 542-8010

Washington, D.C. — Reverse mortgages are intended to help elders age in their homes. Yet, across the country, widows and widowers are losing their homes because of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)’s failure to prevent foreclosures on reverse mortgages that their now-deceased spouses previously obtained. Advocates at the National Consumer Law Center today issued a new report showing the harm that HUD’s practice causes to widows and widowers, and urging HUD to take immediate action to better inform reverse mortgage borrowers and their spouses about options to avoid foreclosure on a non-borrowing spouse, remove arbitrary and unrealistic deadlines for lenders to elect to participate in the program, and ensure that the program can work effectively to help non-borrowing spouses stay in their homes.

“Failing to take reasonable steps to protect widows and widowers from a foreclosure risk caused by HUD’s own unlawful regulation is not only unjust, it’s bad policy,” said Sarah Mancini, an attorney with the National Consumer Law Center. “A significant number of older homeowners now face the loss of their homes as well as their community support networks due to HUD’s harsh deadlines and a lack of information.”

Reverse mortgage loans are designed to make it easier for older homeowners to age in place by allowing them to borrow against the equity in the home without the risk of displacement. The proceeds of a reverse mortgage can be taken as a lump sum, a line of credit, or a stream of monthly payments. So long as the borrower continues to occupy the home as his or her principal residence, the borrower must pay property taxes and the homeowner’s insurance premium, but need not make payments of principal or interest on the loan. Unlike most mortgages, where the balance goes down over time, with a reverse mortgage the loan balance grows over time as the interest is added to the principal balance (hence the name “reverse” mortgage). The full loan balance becomes due and payable upon a triggering event – in most cases, the death of the last remaining borrower.

Congress specified that HUD could only insure loans that protected both the homeowner and any spouse from displacement. However, despite this requirement, HUD issued regulations that required lenders to use form loan documents that made the loans due and payable upon the death of the borrower – ignoring any spouse who was not included as a borrower on the loan. This created an incentive for some lenders and mortgage brokers to encourage married couples to leave the younger spouse off the loan. Most couples who opted to take out a reverse mortgage in the name of only one of the spouses had no idea that the non-borrowing spouse would face foreclosure and eviction because the loan would become due and payable upon the death of the borrowing spouse.

In response to litigation, HUD changed its regulations for new reverse mortgages issued after August 2014, but pre-2014 loans still go into foreclosure unless the surviving spouse can take critical steps within a very short time after the death of the borrowing spouse. The surviving spouses are often unaware of the significant substantive requirements and short deadlines, and may be overwhelmed by the many demands they face after losing a loved one.

“HUD should require servicers to regularly inform borrowers and their spouses of the proper procedures to remain in their homes,” said Mancini. “Right now, too many spouses have no idea that options exist until it is too late.”

NCLC attorneys recommend the following changes in order to make assistance for reverse mortgage borrowers more accessible and viable for non-borrowing spouses.

  • HUD should remove unnecessary deadlines for the program or, at a minimum, provide waivers of deadlines in appropriate cases.
  • HUD should require servicers to communicate clearly with borrowers and non-borrowing spouses about the program and steps needed to qualify for the program, beginning, even before the borrower’s death.
  • HUD should allow additional time for non-borrowing spouses to cure a default on property taxes or insurance when spouses are actively attempting to repay these charges or are eligible for help through an assistance program such as a Hardest Hit Funds program.
  • HUD should require servicers to communicate with non-borrowing spouses at every step of the process, and HUD’s Servicing Center should provide accurate, up to date information to any non-borrowing spouse who makes an inquiry about the status of an application for the program.
  • HUD should expand the program to include non-borrowing spouses who want to remain in the home when the borrowing spouse is still living but has moved out permanently, for example due to health reasons.

For a complete list of recommendations and for more information on reverse mortgages and HUD’s programs, view NCLC’s issue brief.

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

Related Articles

Merideth Akers
January 22, 2023
Who is the person sitting at that workstation? Is it Noah Non-exempt? Is it Emma Exempt? Or, is it Connie Contractor? It is vital that I know who the person is sitting at that workstation. Do I have to pay the person sitting at that workstation overtime pay? Can I reduce the person’s pay for leaving an hour early? Do...
September 20, 2020
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired) Debt buyer was debt collector under FDCPA. The Ninth Circuit agreed with the Third Circuit that an entity purchasing consumer debts qualified as a debt collector under the Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692(a)(6), even though it outsourced the actual debt collection activity. McAdory v. M.N.S. & Assoc., LLC, 952 F.3d 1089 (9th Cir....
January 31, 2021
By Nathan E. Curtis and Peter Francis Geraci, Geraci Law L.L.C. Debtors who are not current on mortgage or vehicle payments may file for Chapter 13 relief and propose to cure arrears, and force creditors to accept future payments. Mortgage creditors must give multiple notices before taking real estate away from a debtor, but vehicle creditors are allowed to repossess...
October 25, 2020
By Lawrence R. Ahern III, Brown & Ahern (Nashville, TN) Part V – Consumer Foreclosure Procedures (Continued) Introduction In the world of consumer bankruptcy, trustees and debtors' counsel often are uncomfortable with the rules in Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). In this space, we have looked at several places where Article 9 meets the Bankruptcy Code. In...
April 4, 2021
The CARES Act, Public Law 116-136 had amended several parts of the Bankruptcy Code, but included sunset provisions terminating March 27, 2021. The COVID-19 Bankruptcy Relief Extension Act of 2021, H.R.1651, passed by the House and Senate and signed by the President on March 27, 2021, extended some provisions for another year. Section 1113 of the CARES Act had amended...
April 14, 2019
By John Andreasen and Patrick Lombardi, Law Students at the University of Illinois College of Law and Duberstein Moot Court Team Members Both consumers and businesses often depend on motor vehicles for their livelihood or, for consumers, access to health care, child care, or other essential services. A creditor’s repossession of a motor vehicle can turn into an existential crisis...
June 27, 2021
By M. Jonathan Hayes, Resnik Hayes Moradi LLP (Los Angeles, CA) (Reprinted with permission. Originally published by the Los Angeles Daily Journal on May 20, 2021) We have been getting a lot of calls recently as you might expect from distressed small businesses. The “free” government money is starting to run out and panic is setting in. The potential client...
June 13, 2021
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee for the Middle District of TN (Nashville) In awarding attorneys’ fees in a Chapter 13 case, a court is not limited to establishing the fee by use of the lodestar method; fees for services rendered should be based on the reasonable and customary fees charged by other attorneys performing the same...
August 11, 2019
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee (Nashville, TN) Exemptions in consumer cases have always presented difficult problems for practitioners and trustees. In a bow to states’ rights, the Bankruptcy Act of 1898 deferred to exemptions created by state law. When BAPCPA was enacted in 2005, Congress continued the practice of allowing each state to “opt out” of...
October 13, 2019
By Cathy Moran, Esq. (Redwood City, CA) Bankruptcy lawyers are accustomed to evaluating the dischargeability of taxes when deciding when to file a client's bankruptcy case. But as we approach the end of the tax year, a client’s current year tax situation becomes another moving part in the “when do we file” analysis. In the simplest situation, the client owes...

Looking to Become a Member? offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.


These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.

Member Articles

Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.

Industry News

The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.

To get started, please let us know which of these best fits your current position: