The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
From the Editor
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Wm. Houston Brown, United States Bankruptcy Judge (Retired)
Turnover of Cars: City must return impounded car. In another opinion from Chicago involving the City’s impounding of cars for traffic violations and refusal to return them to Chapter 13 debtors, the City argued that §§ 362(b)(3) and (4) protected its refusal. The Court construed § 362(b)(3) in light of its reference to § 546(b)(1)(B) as intended to be an exception for the purpose of allowing filing of a continuation statement when a security interest was subject to . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Meet the First Black Woman to Serve as Chief Judge for Federal Bankruptcy Court in Cleveland
2022 Bankruptcy Procedure Year in Review: Revised Statute and Rules and Selected Cases – Part 7 Selected Decisions Under Parts I and II of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure
Bankruptcy Intersecting with Tevis Equals Malpractice Claim
Escrow 102 – Part 2 of 4
Ask Ms. Ps & Qs
Creditors’ Rights and Debtors’ Protections at the Intersection of Consumer Bankruptcy and UCC Article 9
Senior Moments
For Whom Does the Bell Toll?
Critical Case Comment – It’s All in the Proof
The Effect of “Success” (or the Lack of It) on Attorneys’ Fees Part 2: In re Village Apothecary, Inc.