By Cathy Moran, Esq., Moran Law Group (Redwood City, CA) For Californians, the CA Supreme Court’s decision in Brace this summer upended our understanding of joint tenancy and community property. For decades, we “knew” that a property couldn’t be . . . It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members. Join...
From the Editor
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Wm. Houston Brown, United States Bankruptcy Judge (Retired)
Turnover of Cars: City must return impounded car. In another opinion from Chicago involving the City’s impounding of cars for traffic violations and refusal to return them to Chapter 13 debtors, the City argued that §§ 362(b)(3) and (4) protected its refusal. The Court construed § 362(b)(3) in light of its reference to § 546(b)(1)(B) as intended to be an exception for the purpose of allowing filing of a continuation statement when a security interest was subject to . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
From the Editor
The Cloud Cometh
Critical Case Comment – You Gotta Tell SOMEBODY!
From the Editor – Claims
From the Editor – Claims
Brace & Beyond: Joint Tenancy & Transmutation
Is Your Law Practice Evolving to Incorporate New Technology
13 documents by Independence Software – Encrypted and Scans for PII
City of Chicago v. Fulton And the Turnover Conundrum
ABI Commission on Consumer Bankruptcy – A Chapter 7 Trustee’s Sale of Encumbered Property