What is Feasibility and Why does it Matter?

By Leo G. Spanos, Senior Staff Attorney to Martha G. Bronitsky, Standing Chapter 13 Trustee, United States Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of California (Oakland Division)

Chapter 13 bankruptcy is intended to help individuals with “regular income” reorganize their debts. Section 101(30) defines an “individual with regular income” as an “individual whose income is sufficiently stable and regular to enable such individual to make payments under a plan under chapter 13.” 11 U.S.C. § 101(30).1 These concepts relate to § 1322(a)(1) which provides that a plan “shall provide for the . . .

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or sign in below:

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

Passing of Judge – District of New Mexico

The Academy

May 11, 2025

We are sorry to report that Bankruptcy Judge David T. Thuma passed away on Thursday, May 8, after fighting a courageous battle with cancer.

Spoofing and the Legal Profession: No One is Immune

Ryan Bourgeois, Jeffrey Fleming, Lauren O’Neil Funseth

September 8, 2024

Spoofing scams hit with $10.5 trillion warning! If it were measured as a country, cybercrime would be the world’s third-largest economy after the United States and China. As its frequent mention in the news cycle demonstrates, no industry is immune – including the legal profession.

Members

Why Flexible Payment Schedules Matter

Katie Keys

May 17, 2026

Paydays can arrive at different times during the month -- weekly, biweekly, monthly. So, why should your Chapter 13 bankruptcy clients be locked into payment schedule that doesn’t give them the financial flexibility they need?

Critical Case Comment

June 27, 2021

By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee (Nashville, TN) It constitutes an unfair discrimination, violative of 11 U.S.C. § 1322(b)(1), for a Chapter 13 plan which would pay more to a student loan than to the remaining general unsecured creditors. (Somers) In re Kane, 603 B.R. 491 (Bankr. C.D. Kan. June 18, 2019) Case Summary Ronald Kane filed...

Members

Getting Paid for All Your Work Even Post Discharge

Cathy Moran

March 29, 2026

Tired of eating fees at the end of a Chapter 13 when the debtor/client gets a discharge and you get to write off the time you spent in excess of the approved fee? Meet the Bingham Provision!

Members

Ask Ms. Ps & Qs

Nancy B. Rapoport

November 26, 2023

“ . . . how can I not write about an opinion that begins, “This is a case of sue first and ask questions later”? We all know that Judge Christopher Klein has a way with words and a precise and methodical way of approaching statutory analysis.”

Members

Congress, It’s Time to Get Rid of That Stupid Means Test

May 31, 2020

(Reprinted with permission: https://www.dailyjournal.com/) By M. Jonathan Hayes, Resnik Hayes, Moradi LLP (Los Angeles) I met with my best friend Jim King, consumer bankruptcy attorney extraordinaire, during the Thanksgiving break in 2014, several weeks before his untimely death. We met at his office in Glendale to do his oral history. Somewhere in there I told him he could borrow my...

Members

CFPB Proposes Changes to HMDA Rules

May 5, 2019

The CFPB (Bureau), May 2, 2019, issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), which proposes to raise the coverage thresholds for collecting and reporting data about closed-end mortgage loans and open-end lines of credit under the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) rules. The NPRM would provide relief to smaller lenders from HMDA’s data reporting requirements, and would clarify partial exemptions...

Critical Case Comment – Free Parking

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

January 29, 2023

Percentage fees collected by a Chapter 13 trustee prior to confirmation of a Chapter 13 plan must be returned to the debtor by the trustee if Chapter 13 plan is not confirmed. (Ebel) Goodman v. Doll, 2023 WL 216778 (10th Cir. January 18, 2023) Case Summary Daniel Doll filed Chapter 13 in November of 2017. The debtor complied with 11...

Members

Critical Case Comment– Reverse Mortgage May be Modified

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

May 22, 2022

A reverse mortgage, having fallen due as a result of the death of the borrower, is not protected from modification by the borrower’s heirs by virtue of § 1322(c)(2). (Halfenger) In re Sandoval, 2022 WL 982182 (Bankr. E.D. Wis. March 31, 2022) Case Summary Juan Sandoval filed Chapter 13 and proposed a plan which dealt with his principal asset, a...

Members

What is Feasibility and Why does it Matter?

Link to Post:

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or sign in below:

Related Articles

Passing of Judge – District of New Mexico

Spoofing and the Legal Profession: No One is Immune

Why Flexible Payment Schedules Matter

Critical Case Comment

Getting Paid for All Your Work Even Post Discharge

Ask Ms. Ps & Qs

Congress, It’s Time to Get Rid of That Stupid Means Test

CFPB Proposes Changes to HMDA Rules

Critical Case Comment – Free Parking

Critical Case Comment– Reverse Mortgage May be Modified

Academy

Members

Website

Legal

Looking to Become a Member?

Webinars

Member Articles

Industry News

To get started, please let us know which of these best fits your current position: