A Letter from Rich Dubois, Executive Director, NCLC


NCLC supporters and allies –

A bit of good news during a generally troubling time: the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled yesterday that the structure of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) is constitutional, in a landmark victory for the CFPB and a serious blow to President Trump’s efforts to undermine the agency. NCLC joined an amicus brief in support of the Consumer Bureau, and we are very pleased by the outcome of this case.

But make no mistake: the Consumer Bureau still faces a threat to its very existence as a strong and independent champion for consumers, through the ongoing and unrelenting efforts by enemies in Congress, the Trump Administration and Acting CFPB Director Mick Mulvaney to turn the agency from one successfully protecting American consumers into one that instead protects banks, financial services companies, abusive debt collectors and predatory lenders.

Mick Mulvaney (unlawfully appointed by President Trump as acting director) has acted quickly to reverse as much of the successful work of the Consumer Bureau as possible and to hamstring the agency into the future. Under Mulvaney, the bureau announced its intention to delay and “revisit” a new and important rule addressing abuses by payday lenders – who contributed to Mulvaney’s congressional campaigns. It has dropped a lawsuit against online payday lenders that made illegal loans with interest rates as high as 950 percent. It dropped an investigation into a lender (another Mulvaney contributor) that was the subject of a ProPublica series documenting questionable lending practices. The signals that Mulvany is sending are unmistakable.

But you don’t have to be an expert at reading between the lines to understand the magnitude of these threats. Shockingly, a new mission statement posted on the Consumer Bureau’s website actually identifies the “addressing” of “outdated, unnecessary, or unduly burdensome regulations” as the first part of the core mission of the bureau. And Mulvaney has initiated a plan to revisit all of the Consumer Bureau’s policies, priorities, and procedures, and indicated that he will ask the financial services industry how it would prefer to be regulated, an obvious precursor to dramatically scaling back the enforcement of consumer protection laws.

It is crystal clear that a wide range of consumer rights – perhaps ultimately all core consumer rights — are at risk.

I want to let you know that NCLC is going to continue fighting tooth-and-nail, regulation by regulation, to preserve a strong and independent consumer watchdog and to protect the pro-consumer accomplishments of the Cordray era.

NCLC is waging a multi-faceted, integrated advocacy campaign to defend consumer rights. Working in close coordination with a broad network of national, state and local organizations and allies, we are enhancing our strategic communications efforts; building, strengthening and highlighting bipartisan support for consumer protection; and expanding our advocacy for consumers at the state level, where pro-consumer progress is currently more feasible and defensive work is also critical.

Even in these dark days, we’re making a difference. Earlier this month, the House Financial Services Committee was scheduled to vote on whether to open the floodgates to abusive litigation conduct by debt collection attorneys and debt buyers who work in their name. NCLC attorney Margot Saunders and our ally Bart Stichman of the National Veterans Legal Services Program wrote a powerful op-ed laying out the many problems with the bill, and why it was so harmful to consumers. We also worked with allies in Texas and a law professor who published an op-ed that ran in the sponsor’s district the day before the hearing took place. The result? The anti-consumer bill was dropped from the committee’s agenda at the last minute. We may well see it again – but we’ll continue to be prepared to fight it as long as necessary.

NCLC’s expertise is more critical than ever in this suddenly changed environment. And your support of our work is more critical than ever, too. If you haven’t yet made an additional gift in this extraordinary time, I hope you’ll make a gift to support NCLC’s Consumer Rights Defense Fund today.

We’ve been through tough times before, and managed to protect consumers and set the stage for future victories even in the most challenging periods. We may not win every battle, but I’m confident that we’ll win the long-term fight by standing together – and by being right.

Thank you for your past, present and future support,


Rich Dubois
Executive Director
National Consumer Law Center

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

Related Articles

October 25, 2020
By James J. Robinson, Chief United States Bankruptcy Judge, Northern District of Alabama Exactly whose interests does the trustee represent, and when should the trustee object or move to modify? Hope v. Acorn Financial, Inc., 731 F.3d 1189 (11th Cir. 2013). The Eleventh Circuit held that a chapter 13 trustee who was aware of defects with a secured claim before...
March 8, 2020
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired) Good faith in plan proposal. Plan was proposed in good faith, although petition was filed only 21 days after purchase of vehicle, when plan adequately protected creditor against risk of depreciation. Opinion reviews good faith factors for plan proposal. In re Sharp, 608 B.R. 546 (Bankr. D. Kan. 2019). Compare In re Broder,...
November 3, 2019
By Gretchen Holland, Standing Chapter 13 Trustee for the Greenville/Spartanburg Division of South Carolina The hanging paragraph of § 1325(a)(9) prevents bifurcation of a PMSI claim if the collateral securing it was purchased within certain time periods prepetition. A 910-day limitation applies to motor vehicles acquired for the debtor’s personal use. A one-year limitation applies to all other PMSI collateral,...
February 24, 2019
By Cathy Moran, Esq. (Redwood City, CA) We all get sucked in, at some time, to try and rescue a Chapter 13 bankruptcy case gone bad. Make sure that you don’t let a bad situation get worse. Get your arms around §109(g). When only a do-over will do, don’t wait around. No Payments for Months The debtor came to me...
August 9, 2020
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired) Disputed claim included in calculation of eligibility. The debtor’s case was dismissed for exceeding § 109(e)’s unsecured debt limit, when the debtor had signed $1,092,000 mortgage note but the mortgage was never recorded. The lender filed an unsecured claim for $1.7 million, and the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel agreed with the bankruptcy court that...
April 4, 2021
The CARES Act, Public Law 116-136 had amended several parts of the Bankruptcy Code, but included sunset provisions terminating March 27, 2021. The COVID-19 Bankruptcy Relief Extension Act of 2021, H.R.1651, passed by the House and Senate and signed by the President on March 27, 2021, extended some provisions for another year. Section 1113 of the CARES Act had amended...
Copy of Hildebrand-2016
September 25, 2022
Where a debtor and debtor’s counsel initiated a Chapter 13 petition in an effort to halt a foreclosure against property held by the debtor’s LLC, and where the debtor took no steps to correct the filing, sanctions would be imposed against debtor’s counsel. (Grabill) In re Scaccia, 2022 WL 1216284 (Bankr. E.D. La. April 25, 2022) Case Summary Scaccia owned...
Molly Pro picture
August 28, 2022
If you put your ear to the ground you may hear the rumblings regarding a change to Bankruptcy Rule 3002.1 requiring the institution of a mid-case bankruptcy audit. This mid-case audit would be like the Notice of Final Cure but would be performed by a trustee’s office in the middle of a pending Chapter 13, rather than at the end,...
May 7, 2023
The no man’s land between the mortgage due date and late payment is a persistent trouble spot for Chapter 13 practitioners.  For example, are there arrears when the case is filed during the grace period and the payment made before it was late? In Borre, Judge Ronald Sargis of ED CA said no. He held that the payment was not...
Academy Circle Logo Final
March 6, 2022
Diane Cipollone is an attorney and a qualified expert on mortgage servicing and loan origination matters. While Diane no longer provides expert testimony, she continues to consult with consumer attorneys; trains attorneys, court mediators, housing counselors and fair housing advocates on foreclosure prevention guidelines and federal mortgage regulations; and mentors pro bono attorneys and non-profit housing counselors. She has presented...

Looking to Become a Member?

ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.


These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.

Member Articles

Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.

Industry News

The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.

To get started, please let us know which of these best fits your current position: