Judicial Estoppel – The Eleventh Circuit Reexamines the Standard for its Application in Bankruptcy Cases

By Kathryn Sanchez Kasper, Staff Attorney for Chapter 13 Trustee M. Elaina Massey (Brunswick, GA)

The 11th Circuit recently revisited application of the doctrine of judicial estoppel in cases where a bankruptcy debtor did not disclose a claim as an asset in the bankruptcy estate. The recent holding in Slater v. U. S. Steel, 871 F.3d 1174 (11th Circuit 2017) provides for a more flexible and opened ended approach in determining if judicial estoppel should preclude a debtor’s claim. This new standard may open the window for additional assets in bankruptcy cases to benefit creditors which . . .

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or sign in below:

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

What Does “Following” Mean?

Kara K. Gendron

April 2, 2023

Section in 109(g)(2) of the Bankruptcy Code bars a debtor from filing a new case for 180 days if the Debtor voluntarily dismisses a case “following” a motion for relief. Not surprisingly, courts are split on how they interpret the word “following” as used in § 109(g)(2). After all, the word “following” is not limited to one definition, or even...

Members

Think Beyond The Means Test

August 23, 2020

By Cathy Moran, Esq. (Redwood City, CA) It started as a means test question: could emergency medical expenses be deemed non consumer debt. It ended up as a step back to get the bigger picture. Well-seasoned bankruptcy counsel brought the fact pattern to a list serve of colleagues. The prospective debtors’ income in a small consulting corporation is declining, his...

Members

Bankruptcy Court Broadly Interprets “Engaged in Business” Requirement for Subchapter V Eligibility

May 23, 2021

By Lawrence R. Ahern, III, Brown & Ahern (Nashville, TN) Introduction The Bankruptcy Court for the District of Colorado ruled recently, in a case styled In re Ikalowych,1 that while eligibility for subchapter V of Chapter 112 requires that 50% of a debtor's debt must arise from commercial or business activities, the debtor was not required to be directly involved...

Members

Kill Switch: No Match for the Automatic Stay

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

August 9, 2026

Post-petition use of a “kill switch” disabling debtor’s leased automobile after receiving oral notice by the debtor that he had filed Chapter 13 constituted a willful violation of the automatic stay justifying the award of damages and, when egregious, punitive damages.

Members

Substantial Contribution Claims

June 9, 2019

By Nicholas Miller, Third-Year Student, University of Texas School of Law, and Madison Haueisen, Second-Year Student, University of Texas School of Law The second issue at hand in this year’s Duberstein moot court problem involves a matter of statutory interpretation—specifically, whether §503(b) of the Bankruptcy Code allows a creditor to recover costs and expenses incurred in making a substantial contribution...

Members

New Trustee Named

The Academy

September 3, 2023

Tracy Updike of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, has been named as a Chapter 13 Standing Trustee for the Northern District of Indiana. Updike will be filling the trusteeship vacated by Debra Miller when she accepted a trusteeship in the Eastern District of Tennessee.

Plan Modifications and Below Median Debtors

Michael B. Joseph

June 30, 2024

When a below median debtor’s plan is based on best interest of creditor’s test, will future increase in income expose the debtor to a motion to modify to capture increase?

Members

Duty to Disclose Substantial and Unanticipated Changes in Debtor’s Financial Condition

Angela M. Scolforo

December 11, 2022

In the case of In re Ilyev, 17-12987-KHK (Bankr. E.D. VA July 26, 2022), Judge Kenney granted the Chapter 13 Trustee’s motion to modify the plan to require the Debtor to repay some of the $29,250 of disposable income he retained by not making his mortgage payments during an 18-month Covid forbearance. The Debtor never disclosed to the Trustee, or...

Members

Small Business Chapter 11 Update, Where Are We Eight Months In?

November 22, 2020

By M. Jonathan Hayes We are now eight months into the Small Business Reorganization Act of 2019, which took effect in February. The act attempted to establish a cheaper, quicker route for small businesses to reorganize under new Subchapter V of the bankruptcy code. Here are a few of my observations over the past several months. First, some small businesses...

Critical Case Comment

June 16, 2019

By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee for the Middle District of Tennessee Mortgage creditor may not withdraw a notice of fees, costs, and charges filed in a case after the supplement to the claim has been challenged without court approval; the allowance of such a notice will not be permitted where a state statute forbids it. Quicken...

Members

Judicial Estoppel – The Eleventh Circuit Reexamines the Standard for its Application in Bankruptcy Cases

Link to Post:

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or sign in below:

Related Articles

What Does “Following” Mean?

Think Beyond The Means Test

Bankruptcy Court Broadly Interprets “Engaged in Business” Requirement for Subchapter V Eligibility

Kill Switch: No Match for the Automatic Stay

Substantial Contribution Claims

New Trustee Named

Plan Modifications and Below Median Debtors

Duty to Disclose Substantial and Unanticipated Changes in Debtor’s Financial Condition

Small Business Chapter 11 Update, Where Are We Eight Months In?

Critical Case Comment

Academy

Members

Website

Legal

Looking to Become a Member?

Webinars

Member Articles

Industry News

To get started, please let us know which of these best fits your current position: