Chapter 13 debtor’s profligate, pre-petition spending and post-petition lack of candor, demonstrated that the plan was not proposed in good faith and the petition was not filed in good faith. (Frank) In re Ames, 2022 WL 2195469 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. June 17, 2022) Case Summary In April of 2018, after 10 years of marriage, Guy Ames initiated a divorce complaint...
Critical Case Comment
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Trustee (Nashville, TN)
Where a mortgage servicer fails to provide a detailed accounting when it disputes a trustee’s notice of final cure payment and fails to provide a timely response to the notice, the failure of the mortgage servicer’s counsel to comply with the deadlines set by the court justifies an award of attorney’s fees and an order precluding the introduction of any contrary information in the bankruptcy case or any subsequent case; the mortgage servicer was precluded from introducing any evidence that the mortgage obligation was not . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Critical Case Comment
Tax Projections and the Means Test – Part II
Critical Case Comment – Five Theories of Post-Confirmation Property Treatment
2022 Bankruptcy Procedure Year in Review: Revised Statute and Rules and Selected Cases Part 9 More from the Supreme Court: MOAC Mall Holdings LLC v. Transform Holdco LLC
Student Loans Debacle-Part II: Failure to Forgive – The Ticking Time-Bomb
Ordinary Heroes Deliver Second Chances with Bankruptcy
Justifying Reasonable Document Requests
The Complex World of Interspousal Claims in Bankruptcy
Are Monthly Newsletters to Clients Beneficial? Heck Yeah!
Critical Case Comment – Hell Hath No Fury, Until It Meets the S.D. of PA