By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Trustee for the Middle District of TN (Nashville) Where a Chapter 13 plan provides that a mortgage payment will be paid “outside the plan,” the plan does not “provide for” the mortgage payment and, accordingly, the discharge under § 1328 is not applicable to the mortgage obligation. Dukes v. Suncoast Credit Union, 909...
Critical Case Comment
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Trustee (Nashville, TN)
Where a mortgage servicer fails to provide a detailed accounting when it disputes a trustee’s notice of final cure payment and fails to provide a timely response to the notice, the failure of the mortgage servicer’s counsel to comply with the deadlines set by the court justifies an award of attorney’s fees and an order precluding the introduction of any contrary information in the bankruptcy case or any subsequent case; the mortgage servicer was precluded from introducing any evidence that the mortgage obligation was not . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Deconstructing the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act: Obduskey Says Lawyers Conducting Nonjudicial Foreclosure Are Not “Debt Collectors”
Critical Case Comment
From the Editor – Discharge Injunction
From the Editor
Current Mortgage Scam Risk – Please Advise Your Clients
Critical Case Comment – Debtor Refuses to Give Location of Surrendered Mercedes; Pleads the Fifth
Ask Ms. Ps and Qs
Critical Case Comment
Student Loans in Existing Chapter 13’s
From the Editor – Claims