Loss of Purchase-Money Protection in 1325 Cramdowns

Loss of Purchase-Money Protection in 1325 Cramdowns – Part I

By Lawrence R. Ahern III, Brown & Ahern (Nashville, TN)

Part I

Click here for Part II
click here for Part III
Consumer debtors' counsel confront rules that give special protection to creditors with purchase-money security interests (PMSIs) in at least two settings: the lien avoidance rules in section 522 and the special cramdown rules for vehicles purchased within 910 days before bankruptcy in section 1325. The Bankruptcy Code grants special importance . . .

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or Sign In Below:

Username or Email

Password

Remember me

Lost your password?

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

Related Articles

From the Editor – Confirmation

March 8, 2020

By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired) Good faith in plan proposal. Plan was proposed in good faith, although petition was filed only 21 days after purchase of vehicle, when plan adequately protected creditor against risk of depreciation. Opinion reviews good faith factors for plan proposal. In re Sharp, 608 B.R. 546 (Bankr. D. Kan. 2019). Compare In re Broder,...

View Article

Members

Bankruptcy’s Eternal Struggle

May 10, 2020

By Cathy Moran, Esq. (Redwood City, CA) The timeless questions asked by mankind include “why are we here“, “which came first ...” and “coffee or tea“. Bankruptcy lawyers wrestle with “which controls, b-22 or Schedules I and J“. Having argued and lost the Pak case when BAPCPA was new, and felt vindicated when

View Article

Members

Happy Thanksgiving

November 19, 2023

As our ‘thank you’ to our loyal readers, we bring you a completely non-password protected issue! ENJOY.

View Article

From the Editor – Claims

October 20, 2019

By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired) Claimant in proof of claim lacking prima facie validity was sanctioned. The proof of claim secured by the debtor’s residence failed to satisfy Rule 3001(c)(2)(C) requirements, including incomplete Form B 410A with no payment history. The claimant’s attempt to amend the claim on the eve of the contested objection to claim would defeat...

View Article

Members

Ask Ms. Ps & Qs

Nancy B. Rapoport

February 18, 2024

This month, Prof. Rapoport looks at the question: What should happen when the Rule 2016 statement on compensation conflicts with the SOFA #16?

View Article

Members

Critical Case Comment–IRS and the “Innocent Spouse”

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

May 14, 2023

Bankruptcy courts lack jurisdiction to apply “innocent spouse” relief to determine the amount of a tax claim to be paid in a Chapter 13 case. (Taddonio) In re Geary, 2023 WL 2996720 (Bankr. W.D. Pa. April 19, 2023) Case Summary When a taxpayer signs a joint tax return with their spouse, the Internal Revenue Code is very clear. Both signatories...

View Article

Members

Bulletin: SBRA Postscript, the Definition of Income, and Changes to Section 1113(b)(1)(B) and (C)

March 29, 2020

BULLETIN SMALL BUSINESS REORGANIZATION ACT POSTSCRIPT CARES Act Passed by Senate Increases Eligibility to Small Business Debtors with Aggregate Debts Up to $7,500,000 And Other Changes Early last Thursday morning, the Senate passed a substitute for H.R. 748, called the “Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act” (the “CARES Act”). The bill passed the House on Friday, and the President...

View Article

Paying the Car Loan Directly vs. Through the Plan: Till Debt Us do Part?

January 31, 2021

By Herbert L. Beskin, Chapter 13 Trustee for the Western District of Virginia (Charlottesville) In a recent case out of the Sixth Circuit, the Appeals Court heard an appeal by the Chapter 13 Trustee concerning direct payments by the debtor on a car loan and the applicable interest rate. The case is In re Chambers, 6th Circuit, # 20-1376, Appeal...

View Article

Members

From the Editor – Discharge Injunction

March 14, 2021

By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired) Section 524(i) applies only to long-term debts not discharged through plan. Whether § 524(i) applied to short-term secured debts that are paid in full and discharged through a Chapter 13 plan was a matter of first impression, with the Court finding no other court had yet decided precise question. Factors used in Supreme...

View Article

Members

The Hanging Paragraph – Hanging on Every Word Part 3 of 4

June 28, 2020

By Anthony J. Gomez, CPA, former extern to the Honorable John P. Gustafson, Northern District of Ohio at Toledo Click here for Part 1 Click here for Part 2 IV. The Hanging Paragraph’s effect on Interest Rates When the hanging paragraph is applicable, creditors are entitled to the full value of their secured claims as . . . It looks...

View Article

Members

Loss of Purchase-Money Protection in 1325 Cramdowns – Part I

Link to Post:

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or Sign In Below:

Related Articles

From the Editor – Confirmation

Bankruptcy’s Eternal Struggle

Happy Thanksgiving

From the Editor – Claims

Ask Ms. Ps & Qs

Critical Case Comment–IRS and the “Innocent Spouse”

Bulletin: SBRA Postscript, the Definition of Income, and Changes to Section 1113(b)(1)(B) and (C)

Paying the Car Loan Directly vs. Through the Plan: Till Debt Us do Part?

From the Editor – Discharge Injunction

The Hanging Paragraph – Hanging on Every Word Part 3 of 4

Academy

Members

Website

Legal

Looking to Become a Member?

Webinars

Member Articles

Industry News

To get started, please let us know which of these best fits your current position: