The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
Can a Chapter 13 Debtor Have Standing to Pursue Avoidance Actions? A Path May Remain Open for Debtor’s Counsel
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Lawrence R. Ahern III, Brown & Ahern (Nashville, TN)
Bankruptcy practitioners know that every Chapter 7 or 13 case has a trustee appointed to administer the case. In Chapter 13, however, we also know that this is typically the standing trustee, who serves in all Chapter 13 cases before the court in a district.1 The trustee evaluates the case, potentially objecting to confirmation, but primarily serves as a disbursing agent, collecting payments from the debtor and making distributions to creditors. 11 U.S.C. § 1302(b). If there are liens or other transfers . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
New Trustee Named
Acquisition of Post-Confirmation Property in Chapter 13: What Remains of the Estate?
Critical Case Comment – Free Parking
Wholly Unsecured Junior Liens in Chapter 13: The Lien Strip Dance
Small Business Chapter 11 Update, Where Are We Eight Months In?
Critical Case Comment – But It’s a GOLF CART!
Discharging Student Loans Under §523(a)(8)? Don’t Consolidate After Filing!
Ensure You Understand Insurance in Bankruptcy
Critical Case Comment – Fee Wars: The Battle Over Debtor Attorney Compensation
Critical Case Comment