The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
What Is ‘Under the Plan’ Anyway?
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Maggie Reidy, Staff Attorney to Chapter 13 Standing Trustee Henry E. Hildebrand, III (Nashville, TN)
In In re Gonzales, No. 11-10778, 2017 WL 2189562 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. May 17, 2017), the Court considered whether the debtors were eligible for a Chapter 13 discharge despite their failure to remain current on their postpetition mortgage payments. The main issues the Court examined were: (1) whether direct payments to a mortgagee constitute payments under the plan; and (2) whether the debtors’ plan was complete upon the filing of a Notice of Plan Completion by the Chapter . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Arbitration in Bankruptcy: Reading Opinions & Tea Leaves in Recent Supreme Court & Lower Court Actions Part IV
Rule 12(b)(1) Dismissal
Reconversion to Chapter 13 – Betwixt and Between?
Claims: Transfers, Address Changes, and Payee Switches – Oh My!
What Was the Most Unusual Debtor Asset or Case During Your Watch?
United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. Espinosa Ten Years After
Why Junk the Whole System When Minor Remedies Would Suffice?
Rule 3002.1 Does Not Justify Punitive Sanctions
Planning for Attorney Disability or Death
Vesting of Property in the Debtor Cuts Off Creditor’s Rights, Ninth Circuit Says