The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
When Things Don’t Go According to the Plan
Print This Article
Link to Post:
The Shifting Sands of Res Judicata in the Fourth Circuit
By Mark C. Leffler and Emily Connor Kennedy
click here for part 2
Recently, the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals heard a case in which an unsecured creditor argued that a debtor could not include the following (seemingly innocuous) language in his Chapter 13 plan: “Confirmation of this plan does not bar a party in interest from objecting to . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Honoring Black History Month
Demystifying Bankruptcy Appeals
Rule 3002.1 Does Not Justify Punitive Sanctions
A Few of Our Favorite (Chapter 13) Things
Passing of Wichita Attorney
Critical Case Comment – Hell Hath No Fury, Until It Meets the S.D. of PA
From the Editor – Plan Modification
Honorable Kevin R. Anderson, U.S. Bankruptcy Court District of Utah
In re Kaiser Gypsum Co., Inc., 60 F.4th 73 (4th Cir. 2023), pet. for cert. granted, Truck Ins. Exchange v. Kaiser Gypsum Co., Inc., 2023 WL 6780372, (U.S., October 13, 2023).
Herb Beskin – A Proclamation