By Matthew D. Resnik, Resnik Hayes Moradi, LLP (Encino, CA) In Bobka v. Toyota Motor Credit Corporation (In re Bobka), 968 F.3d 946 (9th Cir. August, 2020), the chapter 7 debtor wanted to retain her leased Toyota. Toyota sent her an "assumption agreement" which she signed and returned to Toyota the day before she received her discharge. By then she...
When Things Don’t Go According to the Plan
Print This Article
Link to Post:
The Shifting Sands of Res Judicata in the Fourth Circuit
By Mark C. Leffler and Emily Connor Kennedy
click here for part 2
Recently, the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals heard a case in which an unsecured creditor argued that a debtor could not include the following (seemingly innocuous) language in his Chapter 13 plan: “Confirmation of this plan does not bar a party in interest from objecting to . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
A Sappy Farewell to Jeff Kellner as the Dayton Chapter 13 Trustee
A Fond Farewell
Assumption of Auto Lease in Chapter 7 Requires No Court Approval Says the 9th Circuit: In re Bobka
2022 Bankruptcy Procedure Year in Review: Revised Statute and Rules and Selected Cases – Part 2 Rules Related to SBRA
CARES Act Financial Hardship ‘Laundry List’
Between the 1st and the 15th: Is Mortgage Current?
It Takes a Village
Court Supervised Student Loan Modification
Max’s Knowledge Nugget
Annulment of the Automatic Stay: A Concept Whose Time Has Come – And Gone