By Katherine B. Brewer, Esq. (Westerville, OH) One of the first things we focus on in law school (other than the Rule Against Perpetuities, which always brings back fond memories), is that our clients come first. We learn the complexities of the law, memorize rule statements, and read thousands of pages of case law in order to learn how best...
When Things Don’t Go According to the Plan
Print This Article
Link to Post:
The Shifting Sands of Res Judicata in the Fourth Circuit
By Mark C. Leffler and Emily Connor Kennedy
click here for part 2
Recently, the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals heard a case in which an unsecured creditor argued that a debtor could not include the following (seemingly innocuous) language in his Chapter 13 plan: “Confirmation of this plan does not bar a party in interest from objecting to . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Critical Case Comment – How Much Is It Worth – Then/Now?
Ask Ms. Ps and Qs
From the Editor – Discharge
Meet A Newish Trustee
New Academy Podcasts
ABI Commission on Consumer Bankruptcy – What Does It Mean to Surrender?
ABI Commission on Consumer Bankruptcy – Dischargeability of Homeowner Association Fees
SSI, SSA and Violation of the Stay
Lenders Can’t Hide from Consequences of Misapplication of Mortgage Payments
It Takes a Village