Critical Case Comment

By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee (Nashville, TN)

In re Haroldson, 2016 WS 3034794 (Bankr. D. Colo., May 19, 2016)

An above-median income Chapter 13 debtor is not permitted to take a mortgage/rent expense deduction when the debtor’s non-filing spouse is the owner of the property and the debtor has no obligation on a mortgage.

Case Summary

Michael Haroldson filed a Chapter 13 petition. His wife did not join him in filing the petition.

In calculating the disposable income required to fund a Chapter 13 plan, Michael . . .

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or sign in below:

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

2020 Vision

February 14, 2021

By Jan Sensenich, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee for the District of Vermont I think it was in junior high school when I first started wearing glasses. I remember not liking the idea of having to wear glasses. I thought I could see just fine. As far as I knew, I was seeing what I needed to see. But I also...

Critical Case Comment

June 27, 2021

By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee (Nashville, TN) It constitutes an unfair discrimination, violative of 11 U.S.C. § 1322(b)(1), for a Chapter 13 plan which would pay more to a student loan than to the remaining general unsecured creditors. (Somers) In re Kane, 603 B.R. 491 (Bankr. C.D. Kan. June 18, 2019) Case Summary Ronald Kane filed...

Members

Getting Paid for All Your Work Even Post Discharge

Cathy Moran

March 29, 2026

Tired of eating fees at the end of a Chapter 13 when the debtor/client gets a discharge and you get to write off the time you spent in excess of the approved fee? Meet the Bingham Provision!

Members

FDIC and OCC Proposals Threaten Expansion of Predatory Lending

January 19, 2020

Two new proposals from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) could make it easier for payday and other high-cost lenders to use banks as a fig leaf, allowing online lenders to offer predatory loans at interest rates that are prohibited under state law. Online lenders have become increasingly bold in...

How Does an Idea Become a Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure?

Hon. Rebecca B. Connelly

August 4, 2024

This week, Judge Connelly brings Academy subscribers a real treat. Got a rule change idea? Learn how you can help shape the process. Submit your suggestions and be part of the evolution of bankruptcy procedure!

Members

Critical Case Comment – Watch for Opportunities to Bifurcate Home Mortgage Claims

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

August 21, 2022

Where a Chapter 13 plan treats a claim as secured only by the debtor’s mobile home under § 506 and not real property, the effect of a notice of fees, costs and charges is irrelevant. (Coleman) In re White, 2022 WL 2826531 (Bankr. S.D. Ga. July 19, 2022) Case Summary Shalonda White filed a Chapter 13 petition in July of...

Members

Sugar’s Soured Misstep Equals Sanctions

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

April 6, 2025

Sanctions were appropriate against debtor’s counsel for advising the debtor that she could sell her residence without obtaining court approval as required by local rule when the residence had been listed as “exempt” in the petition and the plan provided that the property vested in the debtor at confirmation.

Members

Critical Case Comment – New Bankruptcy Term – “Sale Plan”

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

January 1, 2023

Confirmation of a “sale” plan (proposing the sale of the debtor’s principal residence) depends upon how quickly the sale will be consummated, milestones established, and consequences for failing to meet those deadlines; a plan that makes payments to the mortgage company under a “sale” plan may not modify the rights of the mortgagee but if care is taken to comply...

Members

Critical Case Comment – Listing a Debt “Just in Case”

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

October 29, 2023

An interesting decision – one we would like for you to weigh in on. Did the Judge get it right? Is this a win for Creditors? Is this yet another case that requires more work from Debtors’ Counsel? Let us hear from you.

Members

The Road to Perdition: Dismissals with Consequences

Michael B. Joseph

May 10, 2026

“Bankruptcy courts face a persistent challenge: granting relief to the honest but unfortunate debtor while curbing repeated abuse by others.”

Members

Critical Case Comment

Link to Post:

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or sign in below:

Related Articles

2020 Vision

Critical Case Comment

Getting Paid for All Your Work Even Post Discharge

FDIC and OCC Proposals Threaten Expansion of Predatory Lending

How Does an Idea Become a Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure?

Critical Case Comment – Watch for Opportunities to Bifurcate Home Mortgage Claims

Sugar’s Soured Misstep Equals Sanctions

Critical Case Comment – New Bankruptcy Term – “Sale Plan”

Critical Case Comment – Listing a Debt “Just in Case”

The Road to Perdition: Dismissals with Consequences

Academy

Members

Website

Legal

Looking to Become a Member?

Webinars

Member Articles

Industry News

To get started, please let us know which of these best fits your current position: