By Lawrence R. Ahern, III, Brown & Ahern (Nashville, TN) Introduction Analyzing the new "COVID-19 discharge" provision added to Chapter 131 by Congress on December 27 as part of the coronavirus emergency response legislation, the Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California decided in In re Ritter2 that, in order to receive such a discharge, debtors must still comply...
Limits of Bankruptcy Court Authority: A Reminder from the Eleventh Circuit
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By James Davis, Staff Attorney to Chapter 13 Standing Trustee Henry E. Hildebrand, III (Nashville, TN)
The Eleventh Circuit, in Wortley v. Bakst,1 recently offered a reminder of the potential inconvenience of bankruptcy courts’ limited adjudicatory powers. The allegations in the case were salacious—that a law firm hired a bankruptcy judge’s fiancé in a scheme to improperly influence court rulings. But the Eleventh Circuit did not end up expressing any view of these doings because the appeal foundered on procedural grounds.
The alleged improprieties occurred in connection with a . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or sign in below:
Related Articles
Don’t Bank on Withdrawal
Serendipity, a Tribute to Judge Jack B. Schmetterer
Musings from a Hapless BAP Law Clerk: Part 1 – Getting Started
Trustees’ Pet Peeves
No Room for Error? Determining Whether Your “Secured” Creditor Has a Fatally Deficient UCC-1
Critical Case Comment – Fair Discrimination: A Win/Win
4 Reasons to Keep Time Records No One Discusses
“Jan Hamilton” – Need We Say More?
Bankruptcy Courts Grapple with the “COVID-19 Discharge”
Passing of Retired Ohio Judge