ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
No Forced Vesting Over Creditor’s Objection, at Least Not in Massachusetts
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Patricia M. Mayer, Esquire, Waterman & Mayer, LLP
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Sagendorph, _____WL_____, 2017 (D.Mass. Jan. 23, 2017)
The consumer debtor’s ongoing struggle to find a remedy for properties being surrendered but never foreclosed upon by mortgage lenders suffers another defeat. The June 2015 ruling by the Bankruptcy Court for the District of Massachusetts in the case of In re Sagendorph, which confirmed a debtor’s plan calling for the surrender of property to the secured lender pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §1325(a)(5), and subsequent vesting . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or sign in below:
Related Articles
FREE RESOURCE
2022 Bankruptcy Procedure Year in Review: Revised Statute and Rules and Selected Cases – Part 3 Rules Related to SBRA (Continued)
Post-Petition Causes of Action, Inheritances and Windfalls Are Property of the Estate and Must Be Reported to the Trustee – Part 5 of 5
Meet a New Trustee
Ms. Ps & Qs
Georgia Attorney Sanctioned in Debtor’s Seventh Chapter 13 Case
Taxes, Offset, and Mutuality
Plan Confirmation, Valuation of Claims, and Burden of Proof
Featured Webinar
Bankruptcy Court Broadly Interprets “Engaged in Business” Requirement for Subchapter V Eligibility