ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
From the Editor – Appeals
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
Failure to timely appeal. Chapter 13 debtor in case closed several years earlier did not appeal the bankruptcy court’s denial of motion for sanctions against mortgage creditors, and former debtor’s petition for mandamus to compel bankruptcy court to consider sanction award was not substitute for timely appeal. Since there was no timely appeal, the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel did not have jurisdiction to hear and deny the appeal labeled as a mandamus petition. Ozennne v. Chase Manhattan Bank, 841 F.3d 810 (9th Cir. 2016).
______________________________ . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or sign in below:
Related Articles
Debt Buyers Pay a Lot Post-Taggart
Ask Ms. Ps & Qs
The Means Test Income
Rules, Means-Test Amounts and Miscellaneous Fees: Changes Wrap Up 2020
Sugar’s Soured Misstep Equals Sanctions
Cars, Fines, and Chapter 13 in the Windy City
Converting Debtors Must Pay Close Attention to Tax Return Filing Deadlines
Property of the Estate or Appeal Rights for Sale?
Musings from a Hapless BAP Law Clerk: Part 2 – Finding the Right Case to Appeal: Finality and Standing
Arbitration in Bankruptcy: Reading Opinions & Tea Leaves in Recent Supreme Court & Lower Court Actions