In the case of In re Ilyev, 17-12987-KHK (Bankr. E.D. VA July 26, 2022), Judge Kenney granted the Chapter 13 Trustee’s motion to modify the plan to require the Debtor to repay some of the $29,250 of disposable income he retained by not making his mortgage payments during an 18-month Covid forbearance. The Debtor never disclosed to the Trustee, or...
Foreclosure & Bankruptcy Filings Expected to Rise after Recent Florida Supreme Court Decision
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Anne-Marie L. Bowen, Esq. and Alexander H. Bowen
The Florida Supreme Court recently ruled on a monumental case that will allow lenders to refile foreclosure actions that were previously involuntarily dismissed, even though the five-year statute of limitations has run on the prior default. In Bartram v. U.S. Bank, N.A., SC14-1265, 2016 WL 6538647 (Fla. Nov. 3, 2016), the Florida Supreme Court held that a mortgagee/lender’s acceleration of debt due under a residential note and mortgage with a reinstatement provision, in a foreclosure action that was involuntarily dismissed . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or sign in below:
Related Articles
Duty to Disclose Substantial and Unanticipated Changes in Debtor’s Financial Condition
Meet a New Trustee
Tracking Down the Illusive Mortgage Interest Deduction
Musings from a Hapless BAP Law Clerk: Part 1 – Getting Started
From the Other Side
The Effect of “Success” (or the Lack of It) on Attorneys’ Fees – Part 1: Judicial and Legislative Background
How Does an Idea Become a Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure?
Meet a Newish Trustee
From the Editor
Meet a New Trustee