The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
From the Editor – Debtor’s Attorney
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
Disgorgement of fees denied. The Chapter 13 trustee moved for the debtor’s attorney to disgorge $4,000 prepetition fee under Rule 2017 and § 329, asserting that the fee was excessive because of debtor’s ineligibility for Chapter 13, exceeding the unsecured debt limit. Finding that the debtor’s goal was to delay a state-court contempt proceeding and postpone enforcement of a dissolution judgment, he got what was bargained for in paying $4,000 fee, and the debtor was not overcharged. The attorney might be subject to sanction . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
The New DOJ/DOE Guidance for Student Loan Bankruptcy Litigation: Promising Early Results
Fannie/Freddie Flex Modification Update
Lenders Can’t Hide from Consequences of Misapplication of Mortgage Payments
Critical Case Comment
Critical Case Comment – If Objection, Arrears Gotta’ Be Equal Monthly Installments
Why Address Formatting Is So Important for Jurisdiction
Meet a New AND Newish Trustee
Critical Case Comment – Relief from Stay, Check; But Better Act Fast
Courts are Expanding the Protections of Bankruptcy Rule 3002.1
Recent Trends in the Interpretation of Midland v. Johnson and the Applicability of the FDCPA to Bankruptcy Cases