By Lawrence R. Ahern, III, Brown & Ahern (Nashville, TN) Introduction Since April 1, 2020, many unemployed people in the United States have begun to receive "a recovery benefit" in the amount of $1,200.1 These payments, under the CARES Act2 stimulus program, were intended to provide some relief to suffering Americans. However, the most financially distressed Americans, perhaps with existing,...
Critical Case Comment
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee for the Middle District of Tennessee
Repeated failure of a mortgage servicer to comply with the disclosure requirements of Rule 3002.1 justifies the imposition of significant sanctions against the servicer. In re Nicholas and Amanda Gravel, et al, 556 B.R. 561 (Bankr. D. Vt. September 12, 2016) (Brown)
Case Summary
Judge Colleen Brown of the District of Vermont consolidated several actions brought by the Chapter 13 Trustee against PHH Mortgage Corporation. The Trustee asserted that PHH had repeatedly included in the debtors’ mortgage . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Notice of Error Regarding Misinformation Given During Phone Call to Mortgage Servicer
Lenders Can’t Hide from Consequences of Misapplication of Mortgage Payments
2022 Bankruptcy Procedure Year in Review: Revised Statute and Rules and Selected Cases – Part 3 Rules Related to SBRA (Continued)
Is a CARES Act Stimulus Payment Exempt?
Rules, Means-Test Amounts and Miscellaneous Fees: Changes Wrap Up 2020
Bankruptcy Court Broadly Interprets “Engaged in Business” Requirement for Subchapter V Eligibility
Appendix – A Review of Residential Mortgage “Stripping,” Recent Developments and the Effect of 11 U.S.C. § 1111(b)
Demystifying Bankruptcy Appeals
From the Editor
Critical Case Comment – The Now Infamous Castleman Case