By Wayne Silver, Wayne Silver Law (Redwood City, CA) There you are, client on the witness stand, judge listening intently, story being told on direct exactly the way you prepared her, things going just swimmingly. And then opposing counsel stands and utters those two lovely words…”Objection, hearsay.” Huh? That’s ridiculous, you confidently think to yourself, just as you hear the...
Critical Case Comment
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee for the Middle District of Tennessee
Repeated failure of a mortgage servicer to comply with the disclosure requirements of Rule 3002.1 justifies the imposition of significant sanctions against the servicer. In re Nicholas and Amanda Gravel, et al, 556 B.R. 561 (Bankr. D. Vt. September 12, 2016) (Brown)
Case Summary
Judge Colleen Brown of the District of Vermont consolidated several actions brought by the Chapter 13 Trustee against PHH Mortgage Corporation. The Trustee asserted that PHH had repeatedly included in the debtors’ mortgage . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or sign in below:
Related Articles
Objection: Hearsay
The Dangers of Extending a Plan Too Long – Or Alternatively, Why Take as Little Time as Possible
Are 401(k) Contributions Disposable Income or Not?
Home Equity Conversion Mortgages – Reversal of Fortune
Critical Case Comment – How Many Cats?
Overly Rigid and Broad
What Else Does the Code Say About Interest and Unsecured Debts?
Well, I Thought We Were Surrendering the Vehicle
Judicial Year in Review 2021: Part 3 – Selected Cases under Parts IV-VII of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure
13 documents by Independence Software – Encrypted and Scans for PII