By Lawrence R. Ahern, III, Brown & Ahern (Nashville, TN) Introduction Since April 1, 2020, many unemployed people in the United States have begun to receive "a recovery benefit" in the amount of $1,200.1 These payments, under the CARES Act2 stimulus program, were intended to provide some relief to suffering Americans. However, the most financially distressed Americans, perhaps with existing,...
From the Editor – Fee-only Plans
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
Below-median debtor unable to afford upfront fees could file fee-only plan. Discussing the issue in the context of good faith, the court found that the debtor was facing numerous garnishments from healthcare creditors, and the debtor could not afford to pay the typical upfront fee required by attorneys for filing Chapter 7. The Code does not require any minimum distribution to creditors in Chapter 13, and the Code does not prohibit attorney-fee-only plans. In re Dunson, ________B.R.________, 2016 WL 2604341 (Bankr . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or sign in below:
Related Articles
I Dwell in Chapter 12
“Lien Stripping” Based on Claim Disallowance by Default: Ninth Circuit Clarifies its Rule
Big Dog Bites Back but Too Late
Tax Projections and the Means Test – Parts I and II
Ask Ms. Ps & Qs
Is a CARES Act Stimulus Payment Exempt?
Justice Sotomayor’s Direction in Fulton Becomes Reality in Amended FRBP 7000(1)(A)
Critical Case Comment – Fourth Circuit Says Easy-Peasy
Strategies in Court Arguments – Are We Tired of Baseless Accusations in Arguments Yet?
How CRAs Know to Report an Account as Discharged …and How They Sometimes Don’t