Critical Case Comment

Two recent cases broadly interpret the exclusion in § 101(10A) for “benefits received under the Social Security Act”.

Case Summary

The two cases, one from the Bankruptcy Court in Virginia, and the other from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, involve different benefits paid to the Debtor but ultimately reached the same conclusion that the benefits are excluded from the calculation of Current Monthly Income even though neither of the Debtors received any benefits directly from the Social Security Administration. In Adinolfi v. Meyeri, the Debtor received benefits under the Adoption . . .

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or Sign In Below:

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

Five More Things Debtors Should Know About the SBRA – Part VIII

February 16, 2020

By Lawrence R. Ahern, III, Brown & Ahern (Nashville, TN) Introduction This series has focused on the four bankruptcy-related bills that were enacted during the 116th Congress and signed into law on August 23, 2019. One bill, the Small Business Reorganization Act of 2019 (SBRA), will be effective February 19, 2020. It appears in its entirety in Appendix B to...

Members

U.S. Trustee Program to Implement Virtual Section 341 Meetings of Creditors Nationwide

The Academy

September 3, 2023

These virtual 341 meetings via Zoom will be implemented on a rolling basis through early 2024.

Chapter 13 Practice in the Time of COVID-19

March 22, 2020

By Alex Schmidt, Law Clerk to the Honorable John P. Gustafson., Northern District of Ohio at Toledo As the United States begins the process of coming to grips with COVID-19, those who work in the consumer bankruptcy world are going to have to roll with the punches thrown by a global pandemic that is already creating financial chaos throughout the...

Members

The Weak Link in the Means Test

Cathy Moran

August 27, 2023

The bankruptcy means test, designed to keep people out of bankruptcy, has a fatal weakness. . . . it’s health care.

Members

Big Dog Bites Back but Too Late

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

January 12, 2025

An alleged lessor’s tardy objection to confirmation of a Chapter 13 plan which treats the obligation as a secured loan is precluded from pursuing that objection after passage of the deadline established by the court.

Members

Tenancy by the Entireties and the § 522(f) Calculation

James M. Davis

February 25, 2024

“Over the years courts have struggled to apply the lien-avoidance provisions under § 522(f) to jointly owned property. . . .Things get even more confusing when the debtor owns property as a tenancy by the entireties. That antiquated form of ownership has odd characteristics that do not fit well into the § 522(f) calculation.”

Members

No Answers?

Cathy Moran

September 17, 2023

What do you do when you don’t know the answer to a bankruptcy client’s questions? After all, you’re a bankruptcy lawyer.

Members

The Kill Switch and The Stay

July 11, 2021

Kara K. Gendron, Esquire, Mott & Gendron Law (Harrisburg, PA) A “kill switch” is a device which can be used to disable a machine or program. They have been used for years in a myriad of safety measures, such as shutting down machinery in the event of an emergency, or to prevent the theft of a machine or data. Some...

Members

How to Present an Effective Summary Judgment Motion

August 23, 2020

By Hon. Erik P. Kimball, United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida (Used with permission - Originally Published by the Courthouse Beacon, United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida August, 2020) Summary Judgment Applies In Contested Matters Bankruptcy Rule 7056 incorporates all of Federal Rule 56 for purposes of adversary proceedings, adjusting only the...

Members

Chapter 13 Debtor Employment in the Marijuana Industry

Michael Gieseke

August 18, 2024

Bankruptcy Courts are beginning to get a whiff of the fringes of the marijuana industry. Namely, is it automatically bad faith for “Bud” to propose a plan when his income is derived from a perfectly legal (as far as the state is concerned) business? Attorney Gieseke brings Academy readers an up to date look at what courts are saying.

Members