By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee (Nashville, TN) It constitutes an unfair discrimination, violative of 11 U.S.C. § 1322(b)(1), for a Chapter 13 plan which would pay more to a student loan than to the remaining general unsecured creditors. (Somers) In re Kane, 603 B.R. 491 (Bankr. C.D. Kan. June 18, 2019) Case Summary Ronald Kane filed...
Critical Case Comment
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Academy Staff
When a Chapter 13 case is dismissed after confirmation, funds on hand with the Trustee as of the time of dismissal must be returned to the Debtor and cannot be used to pay administrative expenses or claims of creditors. In re Bateson, 2016 WL 3475613 (Bankr. E.D. Mi. 2016).
Case Summary
Ms. Bateson (the “Debtor”) filed for relief under Chapter 13 in August, 2013. In January, 2014, Debtor filed her First Modified Pre-confirmation Chapter 13 Plan. The Plan called for 60 monthly payments of $8,500.75 per month . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or sign in below:
Related Articles
Leadership, Office Culture, & Policy
The Uneasy Co-Existence of Federal and State Consumer Remedies in Bankruptcy Cases – the Fourth Circuit Weighs In
The Intangible Benefits of Retirement
Claim Objections: Unusual Burden of Proof
New Judge Appointed
Critical Case Comment
FROM THE ARCHIVES: If You’re Gonna Bet the Farm, Maybe Play Against the House
IRS Extends April 15, Other Upcoming Deadlines for Alabama Storm Victims, Provides Other Tax Relief
Enforcing Chapter 13 Payroll Deductions
Spitballing Chapter 13’s Image Makeover