By Cathy Moran, Esq., Moran Law Group (Redwood City, CA) On its face, Diaz (Diaz v. Viegelahn, No. 19-50982 (5th Cir. Aug. 26, 2020)) is a pretty straightforward decision that struck down a local form plan as violating a below-median income debtor's right to use her tax refund to finance necessary expenses for maintenance and support. On a deeper level,...
Critical Case Comment
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee for the Middle District of Tennessee
The Supreme Court’s holding in Harris v. Viegelahn requires the trustee to return funds to the debtor upon conversion of the case whether the case is converted before or after confirmation. (Jacobvitz) In re Beauregard, 533 B.R. 886 (Bankr. D. N.M. July 10, 2015)
Case Summary
Kelley Skehen, the Chapter 13 Trustee in New Mexico, brought several cases before the court, requesting direction as to the trustee’s appropriate function when a case has . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or sign in below:
Related Articles
Twenty Years After BAPCPA; The Federal Form Still Doesn’t Follow the Statute
Critical Case Comment–Be Careful What You Stipulate
How to Effectively Handle a Difficult Debtor
8th Circuit Kills SAVE Program Disallowing Loan Forgiveness
Wholly Unsecured Junior Liens in Chapter 13: The Lien Strip Dance
Diaz: Is it Really a Tax Refund?
Strategies in Court Arguments – Are We Tired of Baseless Accusations in Arguments Yet?
Post-Petition Equity in Chapter 13 – Who Gets The $$$
The Gambling Debtor – What is a Chapter 13 Trustee to Do?
The Power of a Checklist