By Lawrence R. Ahern, III, Brown & Ahern (Nashville, TN) Introduction Since April 1, 2020, many unemployed people in the United States have begun to receive "a recovery benefit" in the amount of $1,200.1 These payments, under the CARES Act2 stimulus program, were intended to provide some relief to suffering Americans. However, the most financially distressed Americans, perhaps with existing,...
From the Editor – Modification of Plan
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
Trustee could not modify plan to increase dividend or term but debtors were bound by plan language. When debtors had paid the plan’s 74% dividend in the 55th month of the confirmed plan, the trustee was unable to modify the plan to change the percentage return to unsecured creditors; however, the trustee’s motion was more properly characterized as one to enforce the total plan provisions. The plan provided that unsecured creditors would receive “74% or a pro-rata share of $_________ [an uncompleted blank space], whichever is . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
It Takes a Village
I Win. I Win. Trustee Holds Record for Having the Oldest Open Chapter 13 Case
Avoidance Powers In Chapter 13 – Part 3 of 6
An Open Thank You Letter to NACTT – Reflections from a New(er) Trustee: My First Two Years
Quick Tips to Make You a PowerPoint Master – Effective Use of PowerPoint
I Feel A Change Coming On (Song by Bob Dylan, 1964)
Arbitration in Bankruptcy: Reading Opinions & Tea Leaves in Recent Supreme Court & Lower Court Actions
Is a CARES Act Stimulus Payment Exempt?
Parker, HOA, and Sanctions – Multiple Thrills to a Bankruptcy Lawyer’s Heart
From the Editor – Discharge Injunction