By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Standing Chapter 13 Trustee for the Middle District of Tennessee (Nashville)
A Chapter 13 debtor may not “vest” property in a secured creditor without that creditor’s consent.
In re Weller, 2016 WL 164645 (Bankr. D. Mass. January 13, 2016) (Boroff)
Case Summary
The Wellers’ home was worth $139,000. Their home was subject to a mortgage held by Wells Fargo in the amount of $258,000. It was “underwater.” The debtors filed their Chapter 13 petition and moved out of the house.
The debtors’ original Chapter 13 plan . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or sign in below:
No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.
By Judge Michael A. Fagone & Career Law Clerk Ciera S. Dye Although our Nation’s bankruptcy laws are uniform, chapter 13 practice in our Nation’s bankruptcy courts varies to a significant extent in the different judicial districts. One example of this variation is the treatment of postpetition borrowing by a consumer debtor in chapter 13.i Neither the Bankruptcy Code nor...
By Lawrence R. Ahern III, Brown & Ahern (Nashville, TN) Introduction Following Part 1's review of the December 1, 2021, changes in the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, this Part 2 presents a digest of selected judicial decisions of interest for their procedural import arising under Parts I-III of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure. Digest of Selected Judicial Decisions
Rule 9023 provides a prompt procedure to request a new trial or alter or amend a judgment. Used effectively, this procedure permits parties to obtain relief expeditiously, avoiding the time and costs of a full-blown appeal.
The CFPB (Bureau), May 2, 2019, issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), which proposes to raise the coverage thresholds for collecting and reporting data about closed-end mortgage loans and open-end lines of credit under the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) rules. The NPRM would provide relief to smaller lenders from HMDA’s data reporting requirements, and would clarify partial exemptions...
Even when the contentions against a debtor spouse sound in fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, or intentional tort, the claims of the debtor’s spouse survive a Chapter 7 discharge.
In the 1979 Steve Martin movie The Jerk, Martin’s character, Navin Johnson, proclaims “I’m somebody” because his name is listed in the phone book. In 2024 to be “somebody” equates to being on Spotify. Well, The Academy is formally SOMEBODY. We have just launched our first 2 podcast episodes – 3002.1 Debtor Attorneys Were Gobsmacked Parts 1 and 2. Join a funny and frank discussion between Podcast Host Jody Bledsoe and our guest Hilary Bonial.
Where a stipulation of a settlement of an objection to confirmation provided that a creditor’s claim would be “excepted from discharge pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6)”, the stipulation would not prevent the discharge of the claim based upon a breach of fiduciary duty, tortious interference with business relations, unfair competition, defamation, and conversion which resulted in a state jury...
Recently Upsolve printed an article titled: “Why is Chapter 13 Probably A Bad Idea” by Jonathan Petts, July 27, 2023. In a nutshell the article says an unsuccessful Chapter 13 can leave you in worse financial shape. Further it states that it costs more than Chapter 7 and is less likely to be successful. Additional points by Upsolve are: Chapter...
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
Webinars
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Member Articles
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
Industry News
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
To get started, please let us know which of these best fits your current position:
Critical Case Comment
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Standing Chapter 13 Trustee for the Middle District of Tennessee (Nashville)
A Chapter 13 debtor may not “vest” property in a secured creditor without that creditor’s consent.
In re Weller, 2016 WL 164645 (Bankr. D. Mass. January 13, 2016) (Boroff)
Case Summary
The Wellers’ home was worth $139,000. Their home was subject to a mortgage held by Wells Fargo in the amount of $258,000. It was “underwater.” The debtors filed their Chapter 13 petition and moved out of the house.
The debtors’ original Chapter 13 plan . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or sign in below:
Related Articles
Postpetition Borrowing by a Consumer Debtor in Chapter 13 – Part 1 of 2
Judicial Year in Review 2021: A Quick Look at Revised Rules and Selected Case – Part 2 Selected Cases under Parts I-III of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure
A Practical Approach to Using Bankruptcy Rules Effectively
CFPB Proposes Changes to HMDA Rules
Interspousal Claims Live On and On and On
The Price Is Not Right
New Academy Podcasts
Critical Case Comment–Be Careful What You Stipulate
Why Chapter 13 Is a Good Idea: Outcomes and Measures of Success
Missed Notices, Big Consequences: Ninth Circuit Clarifies Creditor Rights