By Lawrence R. Ahern III, Brown & Ahern (Nashville, TN) Introduction This year's changes in the Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure are summarized below. They will be followed, in Part 2, by a digest of selected judicial decisions in the past year of interest for their procedural implications. December 1, 2021, Amendments to Bankruptcy Rules 2005, 3007, 7007.1 and 9036 On...
Hank Wins One at the BAP
Print This Article
Link to Post:
What’s a governmental creditor to do when a court finds that the state’s own laws do not permit the government to recover the funds to which it believes it is entitled? Clearly, the state changes the law.
In re Bratt, 2016 WL 1645147 (6th Cir. BAP April 26, 2016)
In 2012, the City of Nashville decided to get aggressive against Chapter 13 debtors who were proposing to pay their property taxes through their Chapter 13 plans. Nashville’s legal team . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or sign in below:
Related Articles
WE LOVE AND WILL MISS YOU, HELEN
List It or Lose It: When Actual Knowledge Isn’t Enough
Critical Case Comment – Debtor Bears Burden of Proof to Be Ones Own Disbursing Agent
Judicial Year in Review 2021: Revised Rules and Selected Cases – Part 1 Amended Rules
City of Chicago v. Fulton And the Turnover Conundrum
Will Artificial Intelligence Run Wild on the Legal Profession?
“Extreme” Serial Filers
Upwardly Mobile: An Analysis of the Telecommunications Deduction Line on the Means Test
Can a Secured Claim Still “Ride-Through” Bankruptcy Despite BAPCPA? Part 2: Looking Beyond In re Rhodes
Chapter 13 NoLook Fees: The Horns of a Dilemma