The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
Section 522(f) and the Distinction Between Tractors and Mowers: Which Way Does the Law(n) Cut?
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable John P. Gustafson, United States Bankruptcy Judge, Northern District of Ohio (Toledo)
The seeds of a recent dispute are found in §522(f)(4)(B)(v), which specifically excludes a “motor vehicle (including a tractor or lawn tractor)” from the term “household goods”. In the decision In re Evans, 2016 WL 1238853, 2016 Bankr. LEXIS 1012 (Bankr. N.D. Miss. March 29, 2016), creditor Republic Finance fought the lawn, and the lawn won.
Bankruptcy Judge Jason D. Woodard determined that a 12 horse power riding lawn mower – even one that is outstanding in . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Postpetition Borrowing by a Consumer Debtor in Chapter 13 – Part 2 of 2
Unmet Installments Means Dismissal for Pro Se
Is Your Law Practice Evolving to Incorporate New Technology
Conflicting Interpretations: A Chapter 13 Trustee’s Compensation After Pre-Confirmation Dismissal or Conversion – Part 2 of 3
Finding the Flaws in IRS Tax Liens
Quick Tips to Make You a PowerPoint Master – Effective Use of PowerPoint
What Constitutes Property of the Estate in Chapter 13, and What are the Consequences of Failing to Amend the Schedules?
In re Fulton: Seventh Circuit Affirms Its Position with Majority of Circuits on Passive Retention of Property as Violation of Sections 362 and 542
A Review of Residential Mortgage “Stripping,” Recent Developments and the Effect of 11 U.S.C. § 1111(b) – Part 1Strategies in Modification of Residential Mortgages
Bad to the Bone Calls for Retro Vibes. Can You Dig It?