By Pardis Akhavan, Resnik Hayes Moradi LLP (Encino, CA) The bankruptcy court in In re Ritter, 2021 WL 864092 (Bkrtcy C.D. Cal, 2021)(J. Tighe),denied debtors’ motion for an immediate discharge under Section 1328(i) ruling that Congress apparently did not intend that a chapter 13 debtor who obtains a loan modification should also receive a discharge, on that basis alone at...
Critical Case Comment
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Trustee for the Middle District of Tennessee (Nashville)
Where a mortgage servicer ignores various motions seeking to treat its claim as unsecured, the servicer is precluded from challenging that holding at the end of a Chapter 13 case. In re Iliceto, 2015 WL 8785053 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. December 11, 2015) (Kimball)
Case Summary
U. S. Bank Home Mortgage held a mortgage on Mr. Iliceto’s home and was pursuing foreclosure when he filed a Chapter 13 petition in March of 2013. Shortly thereafter, U.S. Bank transferred its . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Did Congress Mean What It Said in Section 1328(i)?
Taxpayers with Expiring ITINs Should Renew Them Now
Furry Blurry Expenses: Pets And Bankruptcy
Critical Case Comment – And There is Also Blanco
MFA – Click It or Ticket
Critical Case Comment – “Extraordinary” Key to Set Aside Dismissal
Thoughts on the Law: “None of My Business” Or “CU Later”? – Does Refusing to Do Business with a Debtor Violate the Automatic Stay?
341s: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
City of Chicago v. Fulton And the Turnover Conundrum
Applying the Principles of “Lady Justice”