By Nancy B. Rapoport, Garman Turner Gordon Professor of Law, Boyd School of Law, and Affiliate Professor of Business Law & Ethics, Lee Business School, William S. Boyd School of Law, University of Nevada, Las Vegas Dear Readers: My guardian angel, Regina Logsdon has asked a great question:what should you do when your “Spidey sense” tells you that your client...
Critical Case Comment
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Trustee for the Middle District of Tennessee (Nashville)
Where a mortgage servicer ignores various motions seeking to treat its claim as unsecured, the servicer is precluded from challenging that holding at the end of a Chapter 13 case. In re Iliceto, 2015 WL 8785053 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. December 11, 2015) (Kimball)
Case Summary
U. S. Bank Home Mortgage held a mortgage on Mr. Iliceto’s home and was pursuing foreclosure when he filed a Chapter 13 petition in March of 2013. Shortly thereafter, U.S. Bank transferred its . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Ensure You Understand Insurance in Bankruptcy
Critical Case Comment– Absolute Right to Dismiss But Not the End of the Story
From the Editor – Discharge
Ms. Ps & Qs
From the Editor
Critical Case Comment – No Mulligans for Gardners
Critical Case Comment – But It’s a GOLF CART!
Turnover by Motion? How About Under Rule 6008?
Critical Case Comment
From the Editor – Claims