By William Houston Brown, Editor/Adviser Academy for Consumer Bankruptcy Education Construing the statute of limitations for actions against debt collectors under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCA), the Supreme Court held on December 10, 2019, that “absent the application of an equitable doctrine, the statute of limitations in § 1692k(d) begins to run on the date on which the...
From the Editor – Claims and Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
Filing proofs of claim for time-barred debt violated Fair Debt Collections Practices Act, or maybe not. Continuing the split of authority on the issue, the bankruptcy court denied a defendant’s motion to dismiss the debtor’s complaint alleging that the filing of proofs of claim for time-barred debts violated the FDCPA. Under Seventh Circuit authority, the FDCPA and the Bankruptcy Code are not in irreconcilable conflict, and the bankruptcy court held that filing a proof of claim is an act to collect a debt for purposes . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or sign in below:
Related Articles
Digital Door Slammed on Debtor Violates Stay
Electronic Filing Scam Targets Attorneys – NEW INFORMATION
Supreme Court on Statute of Limitations Under Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
Saldana v. Bronitsky – Point of View
Ask Ms. Ps & Qs
Critical Case Comment – Swackhammer Smackdown
Weighted Caseload: Why It Matters and How It Works and Doesn’t Work
Fourth Circuit Pumps the Brakes
Dawn of the Dead: Zombie Mortgages
In the Trenches: Secrets to Settlement – Competency in the Courtroom Part 3 of 3