Eight Facts for ALEs about New Information Statements to be Filed in 2016 (12/29/15)

The Affordable Care Act requires applicable large employers to file:

  • Form 1094-C, Transmittal of Employer-Provided Health Insurance Offer and Coverage Information Returns
  • Form 1095-C, Employer-Provided Health Insurance Offer and Coverage

Here are eight basic facts for employers:

  • The due date for furnishing these forms is extended.
    • The due date for furnishing the 2015 Form 1095-B and the 2015 Form 1095-C to the insured and employees is extended from January 31, 2016, to March 31, 2016.
    • The due date for health coverage providers and employers furnishing the 2015 Form 1094-B and the 2015 Form 1094-C to the IRS is extended from February 28, 2016, to May 31, 2016 if not filing electronically.
    • The due date for health coverage providers and employers electronically filing the 2015 Form 1094-B and the 2015 Form 1094-C with the IRS is extended from March 31, 2016, to June 30, 2016.
  • While the IRS is prepared to accept information reporting returns beginning in January 2016 and employers and other coverage providers are encouraged to furnish statements and file the information returns as soon as they are ready.
  • An ALE is required to file Form 1094-C with the IRS; however, an ALE is not required to furnish a copy of Form 1094-C to its full-time employees.
  • Generally, an ALE must file Form 1095-C or a substitute form for each employee who was a full-time employee for any month of the calendar year.
  • In addition, an ALE that sponsors a self-insured plan must file Form 1095-C for each employee who enrolls in the self-insured health coverage or enrolls a family member in the coverage, regardless of whether the employee is a full-time employee for any month of the calendar year.
  • Form 1095-C is not required for the following employees, unless the employee or the employee’s family member was enrolled in a self-insured plan sponsored by an ALE member:
    • An employee who was not a full-time employee in any month of the year.
    • An employee who was in a limited non-assessment period for all 12 months of the year.
  • If an ALE member sponsors a health plan that includes self-insured options and insured options, the ALE member should complete Part III of Form 1095-C only for employees and family members who enroll a self-insured option.
  • An ALE member that offers coverage through an employer-sponsored insured health plan and does not sponsor a self-insured health plan should NOT complete Part III.
  • An ALE may provide a substitute Form 1095-C; however, the substitute form must include the information on Form 1095-C and must comply with generally applicable requirements for substitute forms.

For more information, see the Instructions for Forms 1094-C and 1095-C.

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

Related Articles

February 17, 2019
By Veronica D. Brown-Moseley, Boleman Law Firm, P.C. (Virginia Beach, VA) Many things can, and often do, change between the time debtors file a Chapter 13 bankruptcy petition and the end of their case. A variety of circumstances impact a debtor’s ability to afford their Chapter 13 plan payments, including but not limited to: medical problems, disability, loss of employment,...
Members
January 17, 2021
By Kevin M. Ball, Eastern Michigan University Senator Warren and Representative Nadler introduced identical legislation entitled the Consumer Bankruptcy Report Act (“CBRA”) late in the 116th Congress. Although the bills died without action at the conclusion of that term, the sponsors have indicated their intent to reintroduce them in the 117th Congress. The legislation would bring major changes to the...
Members
August 23, 2020
By Hon. Erik P. Kimball, United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida (Used with permission - Originally Published by the Courthouse Beacon, United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida August, 2020) Summary Judgment Applies In Contested Matters Bankruptcy Rule 7056 incorporates all of Federal Rule 56 for purposes of adversary proceedings, adjusting only the...
Members
November 24, 2019
____________________________ Prior to his appointment as a bankruptcy judge for the District of Utah in September of 2015, Judge Anderson served for seventeen years as the Standing Chapter 13 Trustee for the District of Utah. During this time, he administered over 70,000 Chapter 13 cases. Judge Anderson was elected president of the National Association of Chapter 13 Trustees (NACTT), and...
Members
Hayes Jury
June 16, 2024
A colleague of mine recently asked “what’s the difference between an adversary proceeding and a contested matter?” My immediate response was “very little.” But I decided to take a look at the rules so I can give a little more thoughtful answer the next time I’m asked.
Members
gustafson2
In the continually evolving field of consumer bankruptcy law, a series of Supreme Court decisions shape how cases are administered nationwide. Over the coming months, we will highlight key decisions that every bankruptcy practitioner should recognize—both by name and by the issues they resolve. This week’s ‘memory work’ is: Taylor v. Freeland & Kronz, Law v. Siegel, Hamilton v. Lanning, and Butner v. US.
Members
gustafson2
The final in our series of key decisions every bankruptcy practitioner should recognize—both by name and by the issues they resolve. This week’s ‘memory work’ is: Baker Botts v. ASARCO; Northern Pipeline v. Marathon Pipe Line; Exec. Benefits Ins. v. Arkison; and Wellness v. Sharif
Members
Consumer Bankruptcy Education
October 12, 2025
Bankruptcy Judge Chosen for District of Idaho Selma Native Appointed as 11th Circuit Court of Appeals U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Guy A. Van Baalen Appointed as Acting U.S. Trustee for Florida, Georgia, Puerto Rico, and U.S. Virgin Islands
Academy-emeritus-Logo-gold3
August 11, 2024
Although few are filed, and rarely granted, motions for the recusal of a bankruptcy judge are quite serious. We asked our Emeritus Trustee Committee for their opinion and comments on recusal motions.
Members
Copy of Hildebrand-2016
March 5, 2023
Mortgage loan servicer violated mortgage agreement with debtor, the automatic stay, the confirmation order and Rule 3002.1 by applying debtor’s post-petition monthly mortgage payments pursuant to the contractual terms of the loan, thereby applying post-petition payments to the debtor’s pre-petition mortgage arrearage. (Cary) In re Pope, 647 B.R. 597 (Bankr. D. N.H. August 15, 2022) Case Summary In November of...
Members

Looking to Become a Member?

ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.

Webinars

These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.

Member Articles

Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.

Industry News

The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.

To get started, please let us know which of these best fits your current position: