In the continually evolving field of consumer bankruptcy law, a series of Supreme Court decisions shape how cases are administered nationwide. Over the coming months, we will highlight key decisions that every bankruptcy practitioner should recognize—both by name and by the issues they resolve. This week’s ‘memory work’ is: Ransom, Milavetz, and Espinosa.
The ACP: Applicable or Immutable? – Part 2 of 4
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Mark C. Leffler and Emily Connor Fort, Boleman Law Firm
click here for part 1, click here for part 3, click here for part 4
Since 1984, when Congress created the disposable income test to distinguish the debtor’s ability-to-pay from the highly subjective arena of good faith, the primary battleground over the proper level of flexibility in Chapter 13 has been centered on the intersection of §1325(b) and §1329 . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or sign in below:
Related Articles
In the Greatest Hits Department . . .
SCOTUS Cases Every Bankruptcy Lawyer Should Know
Critical Case Comment – It’s All in the Proof
Fourth Circuit: Brittner v. Beach Anesthesia
Complete Termination of The Automatic Stay Under §362(c)(3)(A) According to the First Circuit
Ask Ms. Ps and Qs
Arbitration in Bankruptcy: Reading Opinions & Tea Leaves in Recent Supreme Court & Lower Court Actions
Vesting Victories: Chapter 13 Debtors Shielded Against Unlisted Asset Claims
Critical Case Comment
Vesting of Property in the Debtor Cuts Off Creditor’s Rights, Ninth Circuit Says