From the Editor

From the Editor – Claims

By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)

Time-barred claim was not revived by debtor’s scheduling of claim. The Chapter 13 debtor scheduled a claim to LVNV Funding, LLC and did not list it as contingent, unliquidated or disputed, but when LVNV filed a proof of claim, disclosing that it was time barred, the debtor objected. LVNV responded that the debtor’s scheduling of the claim amounted to revival of the debt for collection, but the court concluded that under South Carolina law, scheduling did not constitute revival. Even if South Carolina law were not . . .

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or Sign In Below:

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

Critical Case Comment – Ignoring 3002.1 Will Cost You

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

February 5, 2023

Mortgagee’s failure to disclose payment changes resulting from escrow adjustments and interest rate modifications compels the Court to order mortgagee to credit all undisclosed increases and subject it to sanctions, including attorney’s fees. (Somers) In re Kinderknecht, 2023 WL 320984 (Bankr. D. Kan. January 19, 2023) Case Summary Kyle and Chasity Kinderknecht filed a Chapter 13 petition in December of...

Members

A Salute to the Consumer Litigation Five Star General

Keith D. Slocum

April 2, 2023

Consumer law attorney, mentor and educator, Oliver Max Gardner III recently announced that he is retiring. His passion, diligent research and unmatched expertise has served as a north star in consumer law for so many of us. From building a community of like-minded enthusiasts through the renowned Bankruptcy Boot Camp and cultivating an army of consumer litigators to fiercely defending...

Representing Elderly Clients in Bankruptcy – Part 1 of 3

January 5, 2020

By David Cox,1 Cox Law Group, PLLC (Lynchburg, VA) Overview Filing considerations. Perfect Storm! Pensions going down. Healthcare costs going up. Home Equity high. Medical debts increasing. Limited income. Common considerations. Embarrassment. Many of the elderly are from a generation which regards bankruptcy as an indication of moral failure and shame. Confidentiality. May not want family members, including a spouse,...

Members

Are Direct Payments by Debtor on Mortgage Considered Payments “Under the Plan” for Purposes of Discharge?

April 28, 2019

By William H. Brown, Adviser to The Academy d/b/a ConsiderChapter13.org In the most recent opinion on the issue, as of this writing, the Court in In re Rivera, 2019 WL 1430273 (Bankr. D. Ariz. Mar. 28, 2019), in perhaps still a minority view, concluded that debtors’ default in making all direct postpetition mortgage payments was not a failure to complete...

Members

Honoring Jan Sensenich

Dynele Schinker-Kuharich

September 29, 2024

Jan Sensenich is retiring today . . . . Bidding farewell to Jan is no easy task. He has been a well-respected Chapter 12 Trustee and Standing Chapter 13 Trustee for 33 years . . . We love and will miss you, Jan, but won’t miss you too much! Jan plans to continue writing for ConsiderChapter13.org!!

April 7, 2019

By Wm. Houston Brown, United States Bankruptcy Judge (Retired) Attorney Fees - Chapter 13 debtor’s attorney not entitled to recovery under § 330 of fees that were incurred in defending prior attorneys’ sanctions motion. The debtor’s prior attorneys had sought to impose sanctions on the current attorney, and that attorney successfully defended against sanctions. However, the fees incurred by the...

Members

Fond Farewell to Danny O’Brien

The Academy

September 25, 2022

Dear Danny, We know that you would not want a tribute – it’s simply not who you are. But we couldn’t let this moment pass without acknowledging how admired and respected you are. We will all miss you and are better for having known you. You are a stellar example of what all humanity should strive to be. As a...

Brace & Beyond: Joint Tenancy & Transmutation

November 8, 2020

By Cathy Moran, Esq., Moran Law Group (Redwood City, CA) For Californians, the CA Supreme Court’s decision in Brace this summer upended our understanding of joint tenancy and community property. For decades, we “knew” that a property couldn’t be . . . It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members. Join...

Members

The Government Shutdown and Chapter 13 Plan Arrearages – What Do We Do Now?

January 21, 2019

By Jan M. Sensenich, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee for the District of Vermont As we reach the end of the first month of the partial government shutdown, with no end in sight, 800,000 federal workers have started missing their paychecks. As the shutdown continues, Chapter 13 trustees are weighing how best to address the inevitable question from federal government employee...

Members

Critical Case Comment – Punitive Damages? Yep.

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

March 10, 2024

Punitive damages can be awarded for a violation of Rule 3002.1 even where there are no compensatory damages, other than attorney’s fees.

Members

From the Editor – Claims

Link to Post:

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or Sign In Below:

Related Articles

Critical Case Comment – Ignoring 3002.1 Will Cost You

A Salute to the Consumer Litigation Five Star General

Representing Elderly Clients in Bankruptcy – Part 1 of 3

Are Direct Payments by Debtor on Mortgage Considered Payments “Under the Plan” for Purposes of Discharge?

Honoring Jan Sensenich

From the Editor

Fond Farewell to Danny O’Brien

Brace & Beyond: Joint Tenancy & Transmutation

The Government Shutdown and Chapter 13 Plan Arrearages – What Do We Do Now?

Critical Case Comment – Punitive Damages? Yep.

Academy

Members

Website

Legal

Looking to Become a Member?

Webinars

Member Articles

Industry News

To get started, please let us know which of these best fits your current position: