The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
From the Editor – Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
Ten percent penalty for early withdrawal from IRA was not priority claim. The primary purpose of Congress in imposing 10% penalty for early withdrawal from IRA was to discourage early withdrawals, not to support the government fisc or to compensate the government for any actual pecuniary loss, and the 10% penalty was not a priority claim in the Chapter 13 case under § 507(a)(8)(G). Bradford v. United States (In re Bradford), 534 B.R. 839 (Bankr. M.D. Ga. 2015).
________________________________
The Honorable William Houston . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Lawyers are People Too: An Interview with Jenny Doling
Yet Another Reason Why the Means Test is “Broken”
A Review of Residential Mortgage “Stripping,” Recent Developments and the Effect of 11 U.S.C. § 1111(b) – Part 1Strategies in Modification of Residential Mortgages
WE LOVE AND WILL MISS YOU, HELEN
New Payment Option Available to Taxpayers in Private Debt Collection Program
Federal Payments for Foster Care and Adoption Assistance in Bankruptcy
Analyzing the Troubled Chapter 13 During COVID19
Ask Ms. Ps & Qs
Passing of a Legend
Critical Case Comment – No Such Thing as “Technical” Violation of the Stay