Failure of Chapter 13 debtors to satisfy post-petition property tax payments to the county, specifically required in the debtors’ Chapter 13 plan, renders the debtors ineligible for a discharge, even where the debtors proposed a loan modification to repay the mortgage creditor which had advanced the post-petition taxes. (Rodriguez) In re Villarreal, 2022 WL 1102223 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. April 12,...
From the Editor – Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
Fair Debt Collection Practices Act not preempted by Bankruptcy Code. Chapter 13 debtor brought claims against a mortgage servicer for violations of the automatic stay, FDCPA and Texas Debt Collection Act, and the causes of actions related to the servicer’s filing of Rule 3002.1(c) notice of post-petition fees, expenses and charges, including for real property taxes that had been refunded to the servicer. The court found that the FDCPA was not preempted by the Bankruptcy Code, and that the Act’s and Code’s provisions . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or sign in below:
Related Articles
Check Out the Dissent
The Price Is Not Right
Til Debt and Rikers Do Us Part
What Was the Most Unusual Debtor Asset or Case During Your Watch?
When is Enough, Enough? Pro Se Dismissed with Extended Prejudice (and Violates Bar)
Critical Case Comment – Pay the TAXES!
The PUMP Act
All Taxpayers Should Plan Ahead for Natural Disasters
Choice of Staying in Chapter 13 or Converting to 7? Circuits Show It Makes a Difference
Recommendations in Dealing with the Self-Employed Debtor