By Cathy Moran, Esq. (Redwood City, CA) Long after the human patients recover from the coronavirus, small businesses will still be ailing. And long nights will be spent deciding whether to try to stay in business. As bankruptcy lawyers, we’re going to see people in pain trying to assess what to do next. Business owners may see the exit heading...
From the Editor – Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
Fair Debt Collection Practices Act not preempted by Bankruptcy Code. Chapter 13 debtor brought claims against a mortgage servicer for violations of the automatic stay, FDCPA and Texas Debt Collection Act, and the causes of actions related to the servicer’s filing of Rule 3002.1(c) notice of post-petition fees, expenses and charges, including for real property taxes that had been refunded to the servicer. The court found that the FDCPA was not preempted by the Bankruptcy Code, and that the Act’s and Code’s provisions . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or sign in below:
Related Articles
Spectacularly Successful Chapter 13 Cases
Watching Where You Step on Dirty Boulevard: De-escalation in Bankruptcy Practice
Early Christmas Present for Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Attorneys
Amending or Modifying that Chapter 13 Plan? Don’t be Pedantic, Just Do It!
Unjust Enrichment from Spouse’s Defalcation Leads to a NondischargeableDebt
Critical Case Comment – The Plan Rules
From the Editor – Confirmation
Separately Classifying Student Loans in Chapter 13
Postpetition Borrowing by a Consumer Debtor in Chapter 13 – Part 1 of 2
Assessing the Ailing Business Post Pandemic