By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee (Nashville, TN) Administrative fees and claims existing when Chapter 13 plan was confirmed would reduce the amounts received by unsecured creditors in a Chapter 7 under the “best interests of creditors test;” unsecured creditors, expected to receive payments over three years, must be paid the “present value” of that stream of...
From the Editor – Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
Fair Debt Collection Practices Act not preempted by Bankruptcy Code. Chapter 13 debtor brought claims against a mortgage servicer for violations of the automatic stay, FDCPA and Texas Debt Collection Act, and the causes of actions related to the servicer’s filing of Rule 3002.1(c) notice of post-petition fees, expenses and charges, including for real property taxes that had been refunded to the servicer. The court found that the FDCPA was not preempted by the Bankruptcy Code, and that the Act’s and Code’s provisions . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or sign in below:
Related Articles
Reprimand for Deficient Chapter 13 Filing
Do You Really Own It?
Critical Case Comment – Present Value and Attorney’s Fees
Reflections and Ruminations on the “R” Word
Judge Sworn In
Meet a New Trustee
Are Monthly Newsletters to Clients Beneficial? Heck Yeah!
What is a “Consumer Debt”?
Critical Case Comment – Service Counts
Forced Vesting by Any Other Name – Just Might Work