By Cathy Moran, Esq., Moran Law Group (Redwood City, CA) On its face, Diaz (Diaz v. Viegelahn, No. 19-50982 (5th Cir. Aug. 26, 2020)) is a pretty straightforward decision that struck down a local form plan as violating a below-median income debtor's right to use her tax refund to finance necessary expenses for maintenance and support. On a deeper level,...
From the Editor – Property of Estate and Exemptions
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
Spendthrift trust was invalid under state law. Analyzing § 541(c)(2), the Chapter 7 debtor’s interest in a spendthrift trust was property of the estate and could be administered by the trustee. The provisions of the trust were found to be unenforceable as a violation of public policy under Michigan law. Kohut v. Lewiston Living Trust (In re Lewiston), B.R., 2015 WL 3894609 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. June 24, 2015).
________________________________
The Honorable William Houston Brown retired in 2006 as a United States Bankruptcy Judge . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Ask Ms. Ps & Qs
2022 Bankruptcy Procedure Year in Review: Revised Statute and Rules and Selected Cases Part 8 Selected Decisions Under Part III of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure
Student Loans Debacle-Part II: Failure to Forgive – The Ticking Time-Bomb
ABI Commission on Consumer Bankruptcy – Recommendations Related to Exemptions
The First Thing a Chapter 13 Debtor’s Attorney Should Know About the Small Business Reorganization Act of 2019
Ordinary Heroes Deliver Second Chances with Bankruptcy
Critical Case Comment
From the IRS – Using Strong Password Is a Strong Defense Against Identity Thieves
Diaz: Is it Really a Tax Refund?
Kristina Stanger and Jessica Hopton Youngberg