By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee (Nashville, TN) Administrative fees and claims existing when Chapter 13 plan was confirmed would reduce the amounts received by unsecured creditors in a Chapter 7 under the “best interests of creditors test;” unsecured creditors, expected to receive payments over three years, must be paid the “present value” of that stream of...
What Happens in the Plan Stays in the Plan – Part I
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Mark C. Leffler1
click here for part II
“Gambling with a Chapter 13 discharge is a risky proposition” - the ominous opening line of a recent Colorado Bankruptcy Court decision that ended in dismissal due to a material default in plan payments. In re Formaneck, --- B.R. ---, 2015 WL 4241154 at *1 (Bankr. D.Colo. 2015). So, what's the big deal? What makes Formaneck noteworthy? Why write an . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Critical Case Comment – Watch for Opportunities to Bifurcate Home Mortgage Claims
Obtaining Credit in Chapter 13 – Did the Amendment to FRBP 4001(c) Eliminate Motions to Incur Additional Credit?
Taxpayers Should Beware of Property Lien Scam
Meet Another New Trustee
Critical Case Comment – Present Value and Attorney’s Fees
Critical Case Comment–Should’a Returned the Car
Character Counts
A Review of Residential Mortgage “Stripping,” Recent Developments and the Effect of 11 U.S.C. § 1111(b) – Part 1Strategies in Modification of Residential Mortgages
Ask Ms. Ps and Qs
Post-Petition Equity in Chapter 13 – Who Gets The $$$