By Shannon Garrett, Esq. (Topeka, KS) As a Debtor’s bankruptcy practitioner, I was encouraged to see Senator Warren’s proposed reform plan. Bankruptcy is one of the few areas where bipartisan support and action are possible, and being a fan of the current structure, I welcome the reform as a chance to make a good system better. Chapter 7 and Chapter...
From the Editor – Confirmation and Effect
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
Trustee bound by confirmed plan. The trustee’s avoidance of security interest in trucks was barred by res judicata effect of confirmation, which provided specifically for claims to be secured by trucks and for claims to be paid as provided in agreed order, to which trustee consented. The trustee did not establish “cause” to reconsider the agreed order on the creditor’s claims. Williams v. M. Bruenger & Co., Inc. (In re Brannan), B.R., 2015 WL 3942899 (Bankr. D. Kan. June 25, 2015). See also In . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Taggart v. Lorenzen: Supreme Court Stakes Out Middle Ground on Contempt Standard for Discharge Injunction Violations, Leaves Clues About Automatic Stay Violations
Claims: Transfers, Address Changes, and Payee Switches – Oh My!
From the Editor – Claims
Kellner Retires
How My Law Firm Learned to Stop Leaving Money on the Table Part 3 – Valuable Lessons Learned in Automatic Stay Litigation
Critical Case Comment
Why Junk the Whole System When Minor Remedies Would Suffice?
Critical Case Comment– Secured Creditor Granted Relief from Stay. But, Wait There’s More . . . No Proof of Claim.
Critical Case Comment–Sex, Lies and the Barton Doctrine
Rescuing a Troubled Chapter 13: The Unseen Threat