By Nicholas Miller, Third-Year Student, University of Texas School of Law, and Madison Haueisen, Second-Year Student, University of Texas School of Law The second issue at hand in this year’s Duberstein moot court problem involves a matter of statutory interpretation—specifically, whether §503(b) of the Bankruptcy Code allows a creditor to recover costs and expenses incurred in making a substantial contribution...
Whose Hands are Dirtier? A Look at the Unclean Hands Doctrine
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By David J. Rashé, Summer Law Clerk for Martha G. Bronitsky, Chapter 13 Trustee in the Northern District of California (Oakland)
In an opinion issued by Judge Friedland on June 5, 2015, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held in Northbay Wellness Group., Inc. v. Beyries,1 that the unclean hands doctrine did not apply to allow the debtor to discharge a debt owed to a California marijuana dispensary. Rather, the debt could not be discharged and the debtor would have to address the debt through bankruptcy.
The debtor, Michael . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or sign in below:
Related Articles
Critical Case Comment – Creditor Not Required to Dismiss Prepetition Nonbankruptcy Action
The Hanging Paragraph – Hanging on Every Word Part 1 of 4
Substantial Contribution Claims
Critical Case Comment
Did Congress Mean What It Said in Section 1328(i)?
From the Editor – Lien Issues
Separately Classifying Student Loans in Chapter 13
Preferences: When does the Clock Start Running?
Critical Case Comment – You Gotta Fix Your Own Screwups, on Your Own Dime
Critical Case Comment – Bad Faith to Not Pay Both Tests?