The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
From the Editor – Surrender
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
Section 1322(b)(8) does not permit payment of judgment creditor’s claim with property and partial surrender is prohibited. The proposed plan provided that a judgment creditor’s secured claim would be paid by surrender of a lake house in full satisfaction. The court held that § 1325(a)(5)((C)’s surrender may not be invoked to surrender part of collateral in full satisfaction. Moreover, § 1322(b)(8) does not permit “payment” of a claim by delivery of possession of property—this would be a surrender. State law . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
When the Trustee Gets Subpoenaed
Surrender of Collateral in a Plan- What Is the Court to Do if the Debtor Doesn’t Follow Through?
Critical Case Comment – What Does a Tax Return Really Tell Us??
The Hanging Paragraph – Hanging on Every Word Part 2 of 4
Critical Case Comment – Sec. 328 vs. Sec. 327 Not Exactly a Smack Down
Critical Case Comment – Present Tense in § 544(b)
Rules, Means-Test Amounts and Miscellaneous Fees: Changes Wrap Up 2020
In re Crocker: New Approaches to Discharge Enforcement and Student Loan Dischargeability?
Why Creditors Should Get Less in Chapter 13
Critical Case Comment – $67k Windfall to Debtors. Fraudulent??