No More Until Debts Do Us Part: Supreme Court Grants Married Same-Sex Couples the Same Joint Bankruptcy Protections as Opposite-Sex Couples in Obergefell v. Hodges

By Ansley Owens, Contributing Writer and Intern for The Academy (Nashville, TN)

On the two-year anniversary of United States v. Windsor, 133 S. Ct. 2675 (2013), the Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution guarantees the right to same-sex marriage in Obergefell v. Hodges, 2015 WL 2473451 (U.S. June 26, 2015).

The Supreme Court’s ruling in Windsor recognized that married same-sex couples, whose marriage was ‘celebrated’ in a state where same-sex marriage was legal, were entitled to the same treatment under federal law as married opposite-sex couples. Since . . .

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or Sign In Below:

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

Critical Case Comment – Present Tense in § 544(b)

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

February 19, 2023

When case converts from Chapter 13 to Chapter 7, the Chapter 7 trustee is not limited to the valuation of the debtor’s home as stated on the original schedules and may capture the increase in equity resulting from the property’s appreciation. (Dales) In re Adams, 2022 WL 2079725 (Bankr. W.D. Mich. June 9, 2022) Case Summary Matthew and Katherine Adams...

Members

Chapter 13 No-Look Fees

The NACTT Emeritus Trustees

December 10, 2023

As a follow-up to The Academy’s December 3, 2023, issue, three Emeritus Trustees weighed in. Last week’s issue included Cathy Moran’s Chapter 13 NoLook Fees: The Horns of a Dilemma and Trustee Hildebrand’s You Gotta Fix Your Own Screw-ups, On Your Own Dime. You may also want to take note of the comments on each article and add your own.

Members

Laudable, Shortsighted, and Vague: The CDC’s Eviction Moratorium

October 18, 2020

By Riley F. Tunnell, Esq., Godwin Bowman PC (Dallas, TX) The COVID-19 pandemic is not the product of a single cause. So, our remedial efforts must address a myriad of causes and rapidly developing effects. The CDC believes that delaying the onset of the mass-eviction to a time when we may be better able to manage this virus is a...

Members

Special Counsel 101: Getting Paid and Protecting Clients

Nicole P. Novak

May 1, 2022

The Bankruptcy Code imposes many duties on attorneys. One such duty requires attorneys to disclose compensation for services in contemplation of, or in connection with a bankruptcy case.1 Debtor attorneys know to disclose their fees at the start of the case. Attorneys that forget to timely file a compensation disclosure typically receive a gentle reminder to do so. However, in...

Members

Vesting of Property in the Debtor Cuts Off Creditor’s Rights, Ninth Circuit Says

January 26, 2020

By Cathy Moran, Esq. (Redwood City, CA) Clouds of uncertainty have hovered over Chapter 13 debtors who find that they need to sell appreciated property before the case is over. Does appreciation occurring after filing go to creditors on the theory that the appreciation is property of the estate? Or does the vesting of property at confirmation entitle the debtor...

Members

Put Me In Coach, I’m Ready To Play

Merideth Akers

August 14, 2022

You may recognize the title of this article as being the chorus line from the John Fogerty song entitled, “Centerfield.” The song is about a baseball player ready to enter the game. We are at the mid-point of the Major League Baseball season. Coaches will be instructing and motivating their teams in hopes of winning games and eventually winning the...

Members

From the Editor

September 27, 2020

By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired) Debtors’ attorney fees not authorized under Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA). Although the Chapter 13 debtors had prevailed before the Ninth Circuit, In re Sisk, 962 F.3d 1133 (9th Cir. 2020), their application for attorney fees as prevailing parties under EAJA was denied. That Act did not authorize awards of attorney fees...

Members

Quick Confirmation – BAP Says Not So Fast

Hale Andrew Antico

September 25, 2022

Sahni v. Tajima (In re Tajima) 2022 WL 3354006 (9th Cir. BAP Aug 15, 2022)(unpublished) S.Klein J ISSUE Did the Bankruptcy Court err when confirming Chapter 13 plan? RULING Yes. FACTS This case involves the tension of litigation in bankruptcy causing delay, and the need to get a Chapter 13 plan confirmed quickly. Here, there was a dispute between debtors...

Members

New Fellows of American College of Bankruptcy

December 15, 2019

By William H. Brown, Editor and Advisor, Academy for Consumer Bankruptcy Education, Inc. (d/b/a ConsiderChapter13.org) Members of the Academy and regular speakers at NACTT’s annual seminars were recently elected as Fellows of the American College of Bankruptcy, representing recognition by the College of the important contributions by those in the consumer bankruptcy system. Newly elected Fellows, who are to be...

United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. Espinosa Ten Years After

May 3, 2020

By Hon. Brian Lynch, United States Bankruptcy Judge, Western District of Washington, Tacoma Division When the Supreme Court issued United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. Espinosa1 on March 23, 2010, commentators were perplexed.2 On the one hand, the Court upheld the 9th Circuit’s ruling allowing a hardship discharge of student loans in a chapter 13 plan. The Court held that...

Members