Supreme Court Corner

By M. Jonathan Hayes, Certified Bankruptcy Specialist, Simon Resnik Hayes LLP (Sherman Oaks, CA)

Bank of America v. Caulkett, --- U.S. ----, 134 S.Ct. ----- (June 1, 2015)

Issue: May a chapter 7 debtor strip off a wholly unsecured secured claim pursuant to §506(d)?

Holding: No based on the previous ruling in Dewsnup.

Justice Thomas for 9-0 court

The chapter 7 debtor here owned a home with two mortgages. The value of the home was less than the amount owed on the second mortgage. The debtor filed a motion to “'strip off '—or . . .

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or sign in below:

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

Progeny of Law v. Siegel: Sixth and Ninth Circuits Say Right to Dismiss Chapter 13 Case is Absolute, Not Qualified by Section 105

September 26, 2021

By Lawrence R. Ahern III, Brown & Ahern (Nashville, TN) "Equity is not an old man, with a long grey beard, sitting under a tree. Equity has rules."1 Introduction Section 105 When enacted in 1978, the Bankruptcy Code in section 105 included an "all writs" statute for the Bankruptcy Courts: The court may issue any order, process, or judgment that...

Members

Bankruptcy Court Broadly Interprets “Engaged in Business” Requirement for Subchapter V Eligibility

May 23, 2021

By Lawrence R. Ahern, III, Brown & Ahern (Nashville, TN) Introduction The Bankruptcy Court for the District of Colorado ruled recently, in a case styled In re Ikalowych,1 that while eligibility for subchapter V of Chapter 112 requires that 50% of a debtor's debt must arise from commercial or business activities, the debtor was not required to be directly involved...

Members

“Postmarked” Redefined

Regina Logsdon

January 11, 2026

On November 24, 2025, the United States Postal Service quietly revised its policy on when mail is postmarked — a change that could have big implications for anyone who relies on postmarks to prove they mailed something on a specific date.

Members

From the Editor

September 27, 2020

By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired) Disgorgement of fees for nondisclosure. The Tenth Circuit held that the “default sanction” for an attorney’s failure to satisfy disclosure obligation is full disgorgement of fees paid. While full disgorgement may not be required in particular circumstances, the “default sanction” principle required reversal and remand. The bankruptcy court, affirmed by the BAP, had...

Members

Bankruptcy Courts Begin to Create Rules and Orders Governing the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Court Filing

Rebecca Herr

December 14, 2025

“ . . . , a few Bankruptcy Courts have supplemented Rule 9011 by creating new local rules or issuing standing orders specifically addressing the use of generative AI.”

Members

The Effect of “Success” (or the Lack of It) on Attorneys’ Fees Part 2: In re Village Apothecary, Inc.

Lawrence R. Ahern, III

October 2, 2022

Introduction In In re Village Apothecary, Inc.,1 the Sixth Circuit recently cut an attorney's fee by half, where the services were not successful. The panel held that the results obtained (or, actually, the lack of results) justified the dramatic reduction of the fees of attorneys for a Chapter 7 trustee. In Part 1, we looked at . . . It...

Members

How Late Is Too Late to Object to a Proof of Claim?

Robert G. Drummond

May 18, 2025

A resource you are probably going to want to hang onto. Here, Trustee Drummond, offers readers a concise look at the doctrine of laches and answers how late is too late.

Members

Chicago v. Counsel: Who Gets Paid First?

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

June 8, 2025

Administrative claim held by debtor’s attorney for services performed in a Chapter 13 constitutes an unsecured creditor, payment of which will reduce the debtor’s calculated disposable income; unsecured attorney’s fees may be paid as an administrative claim prior to general post-petition unsecured creditors.

Members

10 Tips for Writing Bankruptcy Newsletters and Alerts That Get Read

Ross Fishman

March 9, 2025

“Here’s how to write marketing material that stands out, keep readers engaged, and generate business.”

Members

Tax Tips for Taxpayers to Consider When Selling Their Home

May 19, 2019

The IRS has some good news for taxpayers who are selling their home. When filing their taxes, they may qualify to exclude all or part of any gain from the sale from their income. Here are some things that homeowners should think about when selling a home: Ownership and use To claim the exclusion, the taxpayer must meet ownership and...

Supreme Court Corner

Link to Post:

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or sign in below:

Related Articles

Progeny of Law v. Siegel: Sixth and Ninth Circuits Say Right to Dismiss Chapter 13 Case is Absolute, Not Qualified by Section 105

Bankruptcy Court Broadly Interprets “Engaged in Business” Requirement for Subchapter V Eligibility

“Postmarked” Redefined

From the Editor

Bankruptcy Courts Begin to Create Rules and Orders Governing the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Court Filing

The Effect of “Success” (or the Lack of It) on Attorneys’ Fees Part 2: In re Village Apothecary, Inc.

How Late Is Too Late to Object to a Proof of Claim?

Chicago v. Counsel: Who Gets Paid First?

10 Tips for Writing Bankruptcy Newsletters and Alerts That Get Read

Tax Tips for Taxpayers to Consider When Selling Their Home

Academy

Members

Website

Legal

Looking to Become a Member?

Webinars

Member Articles

Industry News

To get started, please let us know which of these best fits your current position: