Parties may consent to bankruptcy court hearing Stern claims. There was likely a collective sigh of relief by many bankruptcy attorneys and judges as a result of the majority decision of the Supreme Court in Wellness International Network, Ltd. v. Sharif, decided May 26. In an opinion by Justice Sotomayor, the majority held that Article III permits a bankruptcy judge to adjudicate Stern-type claims, provided the parties knowingly and voluntarily consent. Moreover, the consent does not necessarily have to be express, but implied consent must meet the knowing and voluntary standard.

The opinion may be accessed by clicking here. (Not password protected)

See Also:

• Some Guidance from SCOTUS on Stern v. Marshall! (And What You Really Need to Know)

• Sotomayor And Roberts Clash As Supreme Court Expands Power Of Bankruptcy Courts

• Well Well Wellness: The Supreme Court’s Most Recent Decision Regarding Stern v. Marshall and its Progeny

• The World Will Not End In Fire, Or Ice, But In A Bankruptcy Court” – Wellness International Network, Ltd. v. Sharif

• Supreme Court Accepts Cert in Wellness Int’l Net-Work, Ltd v. Sharif