The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
From the Editor’s Desk – Lien Stripping
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
For purposes of strip off, property is valued at petition date. Discussing the various dates courts have used for purposes of valuation when the debtor proposes to strip off a junior lien, the court compared the petition date and effective date of the plan, concluding that the petition date was the critical one for determination of secured claim valuations. The court strongly encouraged debtors’ counsel to obtain a professional independent appraisal of value prior to filing the Chapter 13 case, if strip off is contemplated. Hegeduis v. Harris . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Lenders Can’t Hide from Consequences of Misapplication of Mortgage Payments
The Hanging Paragraph – Hanging on Every Word Part 4 of 4
Director’s Awards Recognize 19 Employees for Leadership, Service
Unscheduled Creditor May Not File a Late Proof of Claim
How My Law Firm Learned to Stop Leaving Money on the Table Part 2 – The “Other Appropriate Relief” of Rule 3001
Tenancy by the Entireties and the § 522(f) Calculation
Amended Rule 2002(a)(5) – Who Gets Served and Who Petitions the Court for Change?
Supreme Court Grants Certiorari in City of Chicago v. Fulton
Critical Case Comment – Debtor’s Counsel’s Fee Reduced to $48k
Bulletin: SBRA Postscript, the Definition of Income, and Changes to Section 1113(b)(1)(B) and (C)