By William H. Brown, Adviser to The Academy d/b/a ConsiderChapter13.org In the most recent opinion on the issue, as of this writing, the Court in In re Rivera, 2019 WL 1430273 (Bankr. D. Ariz. Mar. 28, 2019), in perhaps still a minority view, concluded that debtors’ default in making all direct postpetition mortgage payments was not a failure to complete...
From the Editor – Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
FDCPA claim preempted by Bankruptcy Code. Former Chapter 13 debtor filed a FDCPA suit in district court, alleging that the mortgage creditor violated the Act by threatening foreclosure of a debt that had been cured in the plan, with ongoing mortgage payments to be paid after plan completion. The creditor had sent the former debtor notice of arrears, and the court discussed the split of judicial authority on preemption. Citing Simmons v. Roundup Funding, LLC, 622 F.3d 93 (2d Cir. 2010), the court held that the . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Critical Case Comment – In the Windfalls Category
Meet a Brand Spankin’ New Trustee
Possible Solution for Student Loans?
Are Direct Payments by Debtor on Mortgage Considered Payments “Under the Plan” for Purposes of Discharge?
Ask Ms. Ps & Qs
Five More Things Debtors Should Know About the SBRA of 2019
Engaging a Non-Profit to Solve the Chapter 13 Trustees PSLF Conundrum
Thoughts on the Law: “None of My Business” Or “CU Later”? – Does Refusing to Do Business with a Debtor Violate the Automatic Stay?
Can Good Facts Also Make Bad Law? Finality of Orders in Bankruptcy Revisited after Ritzen Group
From the Editor – Fair Debt Collection Practices Act