The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
From the Editor – Automatic Stay
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
Entry of discharge mooted appeal from stay relief order, but no in rem relief to purchaser from foreclosing creditor. The Chapter 7 debtor’s appeal from an order granting stay relief was dismissed for mootness, since the entry of discharge subsequent to the stay relief had the effect of terminating the automatic stay under § 362(c)(2)(C). The debtor had filed five Chapter 7 and 13 cases; however, the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel reversed a grant of in rem relief, since the party moving for stay relief had purchased . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
How to Manage Incompetent, Unprepared, and Unreasonable Creditor Bankruptcy Counsel
Escrow 101 – Part 1 of 3
Why Address Formatting Is So Important for Jurisdiction
Duty to Disclose Substantial and Unanticipated Changes in Debtor’s Financial Condition
Rescuing a Troubled Chapter 13: The Unseen Threat
The Unintended Filing Bar – Don’t Ignore MFR on Surrendered Property
Judge Carol A. Doyle: Pre-Retirement Interview
NCLC Seeks Signers Urging Foreclosure Pause When HAF Applied For
Critical Case Comment – Funds on Hand at Dismissal Go to Debtor. Not So Fast. 13 Trustee May Be Subject to State Court Proceedings
The Valuation Problem Under § 1325(a)(4)