By Cathy Moran, Esq., (Redwood City, CA) When a married couple books a bankruptcy consultation, you have an immediate problem: There be dragons, as early map makers helpfully provided. Because, as a lawyer friend of mine says: Anytime there are two people sitting across from you, you have a conflict of interest. That pithy expression has stuck with me and...
From the Editor – Automatic Stay
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
Continuance of foreclosure sale did not violate stay. A prepetition foreclosure sale had been scheduled after default, and the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel observed that “’overwhelming weight of authority’ holds that continuing a foreclosure sale date in the manner provided by state law during the pendency of the automatic stay does not violate the automatic stay.” The Panel held that “’continuation,’ as used in § 326(a)(1) connotes an advancement of an action or proceeding. Continuing the foreclosure sale date from month to month in the manner prescribed by Rhode . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
New Federal Guidance on Discharging Student Loans in Bankruptcy Is a Game Changer
Are Your Loyalties Divided?
Annulment of the Automatic Stay: A Concept Whose Time Has Come – And Gone
Conflicting Interpretations: A Chapter 13 Trustee’s Compensation After Pre-Confirmation Dismissal or Conversion* Part 3 of 3
Did Congress Mean What It Said in Section 1328(i)?
Leading a Winning Team
How My Law Firm Learned to Stop Leaving Money on the Table Part 2 – The “Other Appropriate Relief” of Rule 3001
Here’s How a Name Change Affects a Tax Return
Just the Facts, Ma’am – Consolidated Appropriations Act, December 27, 2020
Eviction Diversion Programs and Chapter 13 Bankruptcy