By Lawrence R. Ahern, III, Brown & Ahern (Nashville, TN) Introduction Since April 1, 2020, many unemployed people in the United States have begun to receive "a recovery benefit" in the amount of $1,200.1 These payments, under the CARES Act2 stimulus program, were intended to provide some relief to suffering Americans. However, the most financially distressed Americans, perhaps with existing,...
From the Editor’s Desk – Plan Modification
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
Modification denied to recapture past additional income but plan was modified to require turnover of future tax refunds. The trustee moved to modify a confirmed plan after the debtor’s monthly income increased due to working extra shifts as a registered nurse. The debtor testified that she was no longer getting extra shifts and did not expect that for the foreseeable future. As to the question of whether § 1329(b)’s disposable income test applies to postconfirmation modifications, the court reviewed conflicting authority and found persuasive the analysis in . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
TFS Bill Pay Announces New Attorney Report Center
Critical Case Comment
Meet a Newish Trustee
Forced Vesting by Any Other Name – Just Might Work
Critical Case Comment – What Does a Tax Return Really Tell Us??
Student Loans in Existing Chapter 13’s
Is a CARES Act Stimulus Payment Exempt?
The Case for Conduit Mortgage Payments
The Irony of Filing a Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice
From the Editor