Tolling The 2-Year Period Prescribed At 11 U.S.C. § 523(A)(1)(B)(ii) For Discharge of Taxes

By Morgan D. King, Esq. Dublin, CA

Late-filed and more than 2 years before filing bankruptcy

Does a prior bankruptcy, to the extent it’s automatic stay overlaps the running of the 2-year period, stop the clock on the two-year period?

Nothing in the Bankruptcy Code provides that anything tolls the 2-year period.

Prior bankruptcy tolls the 3-year and the 240-day periods for the time the stay is in effect plus 90 days. 11 U.D.C. § 507(a)(8)(G) (“hanging paragraph”)

Prior rule – nothing suspends the clock on the 2-year period. New IRS position – automatic stay of the period stops the clock based on equitable tolling and 11 U.S.C. § 108(c).

Equitable tolling is based on the aphorism the Code allows the IRS two years to collect the taxes before they become dischargeable. First used in Young v. United States, 535 U.S. 43 (S.Ct., 2002) (plus 6 months).

Rule: a statute of limitations is tolled by equitable tolling. The two-year period is a statute of limitations.

Rule adopted in Putnam v. United States

Main arguments against:

  1. 523(a)(1)(B)(ii) is not a statute of limitations. IRS does not lose ability to collect after the period expires; it depends on if or when the taxpayer filed bankruptcy. Is it a “statute of repose”?
  2. Congress addressed tolling in BAPCPA amendments that specifically addressed both the 2-year rule and tolling, and did not include the 2-year period. Hence, lack of adding tolling to the 2-year rule suggests legislative intent to not toll the 2-year period.

Putnam rejects both theories.


morgan-kingMorgan D. King is a member of the California Bar and has been practicing over 40 years. He received his BA in Political Science from U.C. Berkeley, and his JD from U.C. School of Law, Davis, Ca. King has written four articles for legal journals on the topic, The McCoy Rule, and lectured on it for various organizations of consumer bankruptcy attorneys. He presented the topic of discharging taxes in consumer bankruptcy cases at the annual NACBA convention for 17 years, and received NACBA’s Distinguished Service Award iin 2003. He is a member of the California State Bar Tax Section. In addition to 27 published articles on various issues in consumer bankruptcy law, he is the author of the “bible” on discharging taxes, King’s Discharging Taxes in Consumer Bankruptcy Cases, as well as Fees & Ethics, the Fundamentals of Consumer Bankruptcy Law, and the Guide to Practice Under BAPCPA, and on the topic of delinquent tax remedies, King’s Guide to IRS Offers-in-Compromise, and King’s Guide to IRS Collection Due Process. He hosts an annual 2-day seminar on discharging taxes under his own King Bankruptcy Academy marque. On the topic of the McCoy rule, he has posted a web page,, with links to key cases and articles.

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

Related Articles

Copy of Hildebrand-2016
March 12, 2023
When a mortgage servicer objects to the plan based on its failure to pay mortgage arrears in equal monthly payments, § 1325(a)(5)(B) requires the debtor to amend to pay the arrears in equal monthly payments. (Hanan) In re Randell, 638 B.R. 104 (Bankr. E.D. Wis. January 19, 2022) Case Summary Ms. Randell proposed a rather conventional Chapter 13 plan, seeking...
June 16, 2019
By Jan Hamilton, Chapter 13 Trustee (Topeka, KS) Click here for Part 1 of 3 8. Early Preparation for Trial As suggested, the best way to settle a case is to be willing to try that case, which means you must prepare from the get go. That preparation begins a long time before the eve of trial, namely, at the...
November 6, 2022
Introduction This year sees changes in the Code and numerous new and amended Rules of BankruptcyProcedure that are to be effective December 1. The statutory amendments and the changes in therules that do not relate to cases under subchapter V of Chapter 11 are summarized below. They will be followed, by a digest of other new and amended rule and...
September 20, 2020
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired) Three-month delay in completing bare-bones petition. When the Chapter 13 debtor filed a skeletal petition, her motion for more time to complete schedules, statement and plan was denied, with no cause found for extending time after three-month delay, and show cause hearing was set to determine if case should be dismissed with 180-day...
April 3, 2022
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee for the Middle District of TN (Nashville) Bankruptcy Court is under an obligation to examine the eligibility of a debtor to file Chapter 13 even where no party raises a timely, written objection. (Seibel) Preuss v. Perry (In re Perry), 7:20-cv-04617-CS (S.D. N.Y., Sept. 21, 2021) Case Summary Bruce Perry filed...
August 21, 2022
If all the children in Lake Woebegon are above average, all the small businesses our clients run are quite valuable.If the Chapter 13 trustee is asking the question, anyway. I rail when the Chapter 13 trustee’s business questionnaire asks, “how much would you sell your business for.” Phrased that way, the question implicates all kinds of facts that aren’t in...
Bankruptcy and appellate courts in increasing numbers are considering whether it is appropriate for debtors filing for Chapter 7 relief and attorneys representing them to enter into bifurcated fee agreements. It has been recognized that one of the reasons that debtors may decide to file Chapter 13 rather than Chapter 7 is that attorneys require payment of the Chapter 7...
October 27, 2019
By Lawrence R. Ahern, III, Brown & Ahern (Nashville, TN) Part IV Two More Things Trustees Should Know About the Small Business Reorganization Act of 2019 Introduction Four bankruptcy-related bills were enacted during the 116th Congress and signed into law on August 23, 2019.1 The legislation affected both business and consumer cases. One bill, the Small Business Reorganization Act of...
daryl smith
April 23, 2023
Is there a duty to inform the trustee about changes post-plan confirmation? Yes.  There is an inherent duty for the consumer debtor to update the trustee on any and all material changes, particularly windfalls, post plan confirmation.  In a very recent case, In Re Robinson, the United States Trustee moved to dismiss debtor’s chapter 13 case because the debtor received...
August 1, 2021
By Cathy Moran, Esq., (Redwood City, CA) Eighteen years elapsed between the close of the 2003 tax year and the Tax Court’s 2021 decision Barnes v. Comm'r, T.C. Memo. 2021-49 (U.S.T.C. May 4, 2021) regarding the debtors’ 2003 tax liability. While the most recent decision in the debtors’ battle with the IRS challenged the discretion of a tax officer in...