Ask Ms. Ps & Qs

By Professor Nancy Rapoport

You do realize that this is a Federal court, right? We use the Federal Rules of Evidence.

— Pretty much every Bankruptcy Judge, everywhere, at least once, whether or not the judge is using his or her “outside the head” voice.

Dear Readers:

One of the pet peeves I hear from judges is that some lawyers are unprepared to practice in a Federal court. Why is that? Here are some possible theories:

The lawyer is used to a type of state court practice in a . . .

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or Sign In Below:

Username or Email

Password

Remember me

Lost your password?

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

New Trustee Named

The Academy

September 3, 2023

Tracy Updike of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, has been named as a Chapter 13 Standing Trustee for the Northern District of Indiana. Updike will be filling the trusteeship vacated by Debra Miller when she accepted a trusteeship in the Eastern District of Tennessee.

Laudable, Shortsighted, and Vague: The CDC’s Eviction Moratorium

October 18, 2020

By Riley F. Tunnell, Esq., Godwin Bowman PC (Dallas, TX) The COVID-19 pandemic is not the product of a single cause. So, our remedial efforts must address a myriad of causes and rapidly developing effects. The CDC believes that delaying the onset of the mass-eviction to a time when we may be better able to manage this virus is a...

Members

Saldana v. Bronitsky – POV Counter Point

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

December 8, 2024

In a point-counter-point to Cathy Moran’s Saldana v. Bronitsky article from last week, Hildebrand brings a slightly different perspective to the case which now appears headed to the Supreme Court. See also: Early Christmas Present for Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Attorneys

Members

Do I Really Have to Tell the Trustee About Newly Acquired Assets?

Herbert L. Beskin

January 9, 2022

It has long been a vexing question for Trustees and attorneys alike: do Debtors have to disclose assets acquired post-petition? In a lengthy and well-documented opinion, Chief Bankruptcy Court Judge John Waites of South Carolina has presented his take on this issue and concluded, with some important exceptions, that they do not. The case is In re Thomas L. Boyd,...

Members

Seventh Circuit Agrees with Ninth and Tenth

The Academy

May 19, 2024

In Marshall v Johnson, 2004 WL 1953490 (7th Cir. May 3, 2024), the Seventh Circuit agreed with the holdings from the Ninth and Tenth Circuits, In re Doll, 57 F.4th 1129 (10th Cir. 2023), and In re Evans, 69 F.4th 1101 (9th Cir. 2023). Under these decisions, Chapter 13 trustees may not retain fees when the case is dismissed prior to confirmation.

Critical Case Comment – Fair Discrimination: A Win/Win

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

December 11, 2022

A Chapter 13 plan can be confirmed to pay a 100% dividend to unsecured creditors while maintaining payments to a student loan creditor as a long-term debt (which will not satisfy the student loan in the commitment period) without committing all available disposable income. (Mullin) In re Victoria Florita Durand-Day, 2022 WL 14938726 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. October 26, 2022) Case...

Members

Procedural Enlargement of Claims Bar Date

Jitwan K. Floyd

June 2, 2024

Rule 3002 outlines requirements and offers remedies for untimely claims, giving bankruptcy judges discretion to grant relief. However, creditors should view these exceptions as corrective measures rather than substantial rights.

Members

The Hanging Paragraph – Hanging on Every Word Part 4 of 4

July 5, 2020

By Anthony J. Gomez, CPA, former extern to the Honorable John P. Gustafson, Northern District of Ohio at Toledo V. The Good Faith Requirement The hanging paragraph was enacted to protect creditors. It accomplishes this by prohibiting the bifurcation of certain secured debts that were acquired shortly before the time of filing. Despite a Chapter 13 debtor’s inability to bifurcate...

Members

Critical Case Comment – Nothing Requires a Plan to Provide for All Secured Claims

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

December 12, 2021

If a Chapter 13 plan makes no provision for a mortgage obligation, omits any treatment of the mortgage claims, and prohibits the Trustee from making disbursements toward the claims, the claims are not provided for by the plan and the plan can be confirmed over the objection of the creditor and the trustee; nothing requires a plan to provide for...

Members

Assumption of Auto Lease in Chapter 7 Requires No Court Approval Says the 9th Circuit: In re Bobka

May 9, 2021

By Matthew D. Resnik, Resnik Hayes Moradi, LLP (Encino, CA) In Bobka v. Toyota Motor Credit Corporation (In re Bobka), 968 F.3d 946 (9th Cir. August, 2020), the chapter 7 debtor wanted to retain her leased Toyota. Toyota sent her an "assumption agreement" which she signed and returned to Toyota the day before she received her discharge. By then she...

Members

Ask Ms. Ps & Qs

Link to Post:

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or Sign In Below:

Related Articles

New Trustee Named

Laudable, Shortsighted, and Vague: The CDC’s Eviction Moratorium

Saldana v. Bronitsky – POV Counter Point

Do I Really Have to Tell the Trustee About Newly Acquired Assets?

Seventh Circuit Agrees with Ninth and Tenth

Critical Case Comment – Fair Discrimination: A Win/Win

Procedural Enlargement of Claims Bar Date

The Hanging Paragraph – Hanging on Every Word Part 4 of 4

Critical Case Comment – Nothing Requires a Plan to Provide for All Secured Claims

Assumption of Auto Lease in Chapter 7 Requires No Court Approval Says the 9th Circuit: In re Bobka

Academy

Members

Website

Legal

Looking to Become a Member?

Webinars

Member Articles

Industry News

To get started, please let us know which of these best fits your current position: